1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00999207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in random utility models report of the workshop on advances in random utility models duke invitational symposium on choice modeling behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical foundations of DCE are grounded in random utility theory [36], which assumes that people generally choose the option that provides them with the highest level of utility and that any amount of deviation from that choice can be explained by random factors. Following the theory, a random utility model (RUM) aims at modelling the choices of individuals among discrete sets of alternatives [36], [37]. In its simplest form, a DCE presents individuals with two alternative scenarios (e.g., health and/or quality of life states), each containing a number of attributes, between which individuals are asked to choose their preferred scenario.…”
Section: Discrete Choice Experiments With Durationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical foundations of DCE are grounded in random utility theory [36], which assumes that people generally choose the option that provides them with the highest level of utility and that any amount of deviation from that choice can be explained by random factors. Following the theory, a random utility model (RUM) aims at modelling the choices of individuals among discrete sets of alternatives [36], [37]. In its simplest form, a DCE presents individuals with two alternative scenarios (e.g., health and/or quality of life states), each containing a number of attributes, between which individuals are asked to choose their preferred scenario.…”
Section: Discrete Choice Experiments With Durationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For examples, see the special issue of the Journal of Econometrics (1993, v. 58, July, p. 1-274) and Marketing Letters (1994, v. 5Ϻ4, p. 335-350). However, all empirical studies are limited to a binary response variable, and even many theoretical developments tend to focus on binary response models, as described in Horowitz et al (1994). (c) Semiparametric II: While correct specification of a random component is important for consistent estimation of systematic utility, response shape of systematic utility could suggest interesting behavioral implications.…”
Section: Model Forms For Choice Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utility assigned to each alternative is determined by several attributes or characteristics, and since an individual's direct utility cannot be measured; their choices can be observed [ 24 ]. The utility of an alternative in this case depends on the attributes of the alternative as well as the individual whereby some are observable while others are unobservable to the analyst [ 25 ]. The observed attributes are represented as explanatory variables (deterministic component) while the unobserved attributes are treated as random variables (stochastic component) in the utility function [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%