2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abb7c2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in modelling gold nanoparticle radiosensitization using new Geant4-DNA physics models

Abstract: Gold nanoparticles have demonstrated significant radiosensitization of cancer treatment with x-ray radiotherapy. To understand the mechanisms at the basis of nanoparticle radiosensitization, Monte Carlo simulations are used to investigate the dose enhancement, given a certain nanoparticle concentration and distribution in the biological medium. Earlier studies have ordinarily used condensed history physics models to predict nanoscale dose enhancement with nanoparticles. This study uses Geant4-DNA complemented … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…45 However, a more homogeneously distribution of GNPs in cells can simulate the average GNP distribution surrounding the nucleus to produce a universal estimate about dose enhancement due to the GNPs. This is an appropriate estimate and the reason why gold shell-like geometries have been adopted to approximate the distribution of GNPs as in the work of McKinnon et al 46 and Engels et al, 7 as well as our previous study. 8 Additionally, small GNPs can be taken by nucleus through nuclear pore in practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…45 However, a more homogeneously distribution of GNPs in cells can simulate the average GNP distribution surrounding the nucleus to produce a universal estimate about dose enhancement due to the GNPs. This is an appropriate estimate and the reason why gold shell-like geometries have been adopted to approximate the distribution of GNPs as in the work of McKinnon et al 46 and Engels et al, 7 as well as our previous study. 8 Additionally, small GNPs can be taken by nucleus through nuclear pore in practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, the radiosensitization mechanism of metallic nanomaterials is not well understood, and the accurate prediction of the related biological effects remains a significant challenge in radiobiology research. A number of theoretical models and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations have made signification contributions to better understand and predict these effects [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] and have been used to investigate the radiosensitization of GNPs for various geometrical parameters and radiation modalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Geant4-DNA models have been tested and validated against reference data (i.e., NIST, ICRU) and wherever available versus experimental data and other MC simulation studies. Comparisons between the condensed history models of Geant4 and the track-structure models of Geant4-DNA have also been undertaken for particular applications [ 14 , 23 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ].…”
Section: The Geant4-dna Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, Figure S17 shows the source emitting in the nucleus and in the culture medium around the cell. The choice of the above irradiation scenarios (single AuNP and gold shell) is largely supported by many studies present in literature [ 52 , 65 ] The single AuNP model mimics a cluster of AuNPs in the nucleus; whereas, the gold shell around the nucleus mimics a preferential AuNPs distribution among the nucleus and cytoplasm, as reported elsewhere [ 65 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%