2021
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.614300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in Modeling the Immune Microenvironment of Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related death in the US. CRC frequently metastasizes to the liver and these patients have a particularly poor prognosis. The infiltration of immune cells into CRC tumors and liver metastases accurately predicts disease progression and patient survival. Despite the evident influence of immune cells in the CRC tumor microenvironment (TME), efforts to identify immunotherapies for CRC patients have been limited. Here, we arg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…85 This is certainly the case where 2D, cost-effective cell monolayers are used. 30,86 In vitro 3D models using ex vivo human tumour tissues, 87 such as spheroids and organoids, 88 are increasingly being used, but the immunecomponent, vasculature and other stromal components of such models are often neglected. 89,90 The lack of in vitro models that adequately represent the native in vivo environment remains a significant hurdle in the preclinical development of immunotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…85 This is certainly the case where 2D, cost-effective cell monolayers are used. 30,86 In vitro 3D models using ex vivo human tumour tissues, 87 such as spheroids and organoids, 88 are increasingly being used, but the immunecomponent, vasculature and other stromal components of such models are often neglected. 89,90 The lack of in vitro models that adequately represent the native in vivo environment remains a significant hurdle in the preclinical development of immunotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 The complexity originating from the intricate spatial cellular organizations within the TME and their interactions with immune inhibitory mechanisms highlights the need for complex in vitro models that faithfully mimic human in vivo scenarios. 30,31 Various solutions to these challenges can be provided by microfluidic and organ-on-achip technologies that enable miniaturisation, maximise the use of intact human tumour tissue, allow the robust and controlled modelling of tumour microenvironment characteristics and facilitate the culture of multiple cell types in defined spatial and temporal configurations. 27 The application of these technologies in the field of immuneoncology is discussed in more detail below.…”
Section: Immunotherapies For Solid Tumoursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also organ-on-a-chip models that fully grasp the 3D microenvironment of cancer cells ( Glaser et al, 2022 ). For example, the immune microenvironment of cancer cells has been analyzed employing these organ-on-a-chip technologies ( Yoon et al, 2020 ). Long-term studies are possible without leading to an excess of cell death and less growth factors need to be supplemented.…”
Section: Molecular Mechanosensory Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-dimensional (2D) cell culture models present several advantages such as cost-effectiveness and simplicity in terms of preparation, maintenance, and monitoring, allowing for amenable microscopic and molecular investigations [ 13 ]. However, 2D cultures rely on cells adhering to the host flat surface, normally a flask or plate, which does not mimic the 3D architecture of tumor tissues ( Figure 2 A) [ 14 ]. Furthermore, the cells are exposed to a relatively steady and uniform source of oxygen, nutrients, and growth factors, preventing them from resembling the in the vivo tumor microenvironment (TME) [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Comparison Of 2d and 3d Tumor Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 2D cultures rely on cells adhering to the host flat surface, normally a flask or plate, which does not mimic the 3D architecture of tumor tissues ( Figure 2 A) [ 14 ]. Furthermore, the cells are exposed to a relatively steady and uniform source of oxygen, nutrients, and growth factors, preventing them from resembling the in the vivo tumor microenvironment (TME) [ 13 , 14 ]. For example, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), endothelial cells (ECs), and cancer-associated adipose (CAA) are key components of breast cancer progression and carcinogenesis that compromise the tumor microenvironment [ 15 ].…”
Section: Comparison Of 2d and 3d Tumor Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%