2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scp.2022.100812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in mesoporous material for adsorption and photoconversion of CO2 in environmental pollution: Clean environment and clean energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison between soft and hard templating methods for the synthesis of mesoporous materials . Reproduced with permission from ref . Copyright 2022 Elsevier.…”
Section: Synthesis Methods For Mesoporous Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparison between soft and hard templating methods for the synthesis of mesoporous materials . Reproduced with permission from ref . Copyright 2022 Elsevier.…”
Section: Synthesis Methods For Mesoporous Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthesis route for a mesoporous material using the sol–gel method . Reproduced with permission from ref . Copyright 2022 Elsevier.…”
Section: Synthesis Methods For Mesoporous Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SEM images in general indicate granular surfaces with different pore sizes due to the liberation of volatile organic compounds [15], The pore structure is one of the factors that determines the performance and quality of the adsorbent [21] and this in turn depends on the raw material used, since the chemical composition varies according to the precursor, where the precursors rich in carbon are of main interest for the synthesis of high-yield adsorbents [22][23][24].…”
Section: ) Scanning Electron Microscopy (Sem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absorption, adsorption and photoconversion of CO 2 (Fadillah & Saleh, 2022;Saleh, 2022aSaleh, , 2022b, membrane, chemical looping, and geothermal and biochemical technologies are currently one of the most effective techniques for reducing CO 2 emissions. Different approaches available for carbon dioxide capture include post-combustion, precombustion and oxy-fuel approaches (D'Alessandro et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that for conventional absorbents like MEA to absorb CO 2 from flue gas in power plants would increase the cost of investment by 60% for lower net energy output of the plant and capital investment cost where the reduction of cost with promising solvent combinations like CESAR-1 was not considerable as well (Manzolini et al, 2015). Any modification in the efficiency of any step of the method will reduce the estimated costs where different technologies have been studied for CO2 capture (Fadillah & Saleh, 2022;Saleh, 2022aSaleh, , 2022b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%