2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2021.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in magnetic resonance imaging of orbital disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In computed tomography (CT), they all showed high density with enhancement. These features are not specific to uveal melanoma and they have also been observed in other common intraocular tumors such as retinoblastoma and retinal or choroidal hemangioma [11,[22][23][24] . Therefore, the MRI and the CT scan alone cannot be used to identify two of them.…”
Section: Imaging Examinations Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In computed tomography (CT), they all showed high density with enhancement. These features are not specific to uveal melanoma and they have also been observed in other common intraocular tumors such as retinoblastoma and retinal or choroidal hemangioma [11,[22][23][24] . Therefore, the MRI and the CT scan alone cannot be used to identify two of them.…”
Section: Imaging Examinations Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Orbital complications often spread from ethmoidal sinusitis and include pre-septal cellulitis, orbital cellulitis, subperiosteal or orbital abscess. 25 CT scan is superior for orbital walls such as lamina papyracea and other walls. However, CT scan has lesser sensitivity of intraorbital soft tissue.…”
Section: Complications Of Sinusitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an effective imaging modality for visualizing the ONs and detecting pathological changes due to its high soft-tissue contrast and the avoidance of ionizing radiation 10 . Advances in MRI techniques have enabled the acquisition of high-resolution 3D T2-weighted MR images that, unlike computed tomography (CT) and T1-weighted MRI, produce a distinct contrast between the ON and its surrounding CSF 11 . However, segmenting and quantifying the ONs is challenged by their complex morphology 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 10 Advances in MRI techniques have enabled the acquisition of high-resolution 3D T2-weighted MR images that, unlike computed tomography (CT) and T1-weighted MRI, produce a distinct contrast between the ON and its surrounding CSF. 11 However, segmenting and quantifying the ONs is challenged by their complex morphology. 12 Manual annotation by an experienced radiologist is therefore time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to inter- and intrarater variability, emphasizing the need for automatic methods for accurate ON segmentation and quantification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%