2014
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in interpretation of subsurface processes with time‐lapse electrical imaging

Abstract: Electrical geophysical methods, including electrical resistivity, time‐domain induced polarization, and complex resistivity, have become commonly used to image the near subsurface. Here, we outline their utility for time‐lapse imaging of hydrological, geochemical, and biogeochemical processes, focusing on new instrumentation, processing, and analysis techniques specific to monitoring. We review data collection procedures, parameters measured, and petrophysical relationships and then outline the state of the sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 216 publications
(271 reference statements)
0
103
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain the ''true'' subsurface resistivity distribution, we inverted the apparent resistivity data using the iterative tomographic inversion scheme of the RES2DINV software (Loke and Barker, 1995). To minimize artefacts produced by numerical inaccuracies from inverting each dataset separately, the time-lapse inversion method was applied which uses a common reference model to jointly invert datasets from different dates (Loke, 2013;Singha et al, 2014). We inverted the first dataset collected on 8 November 2012 to produce the starting and reference model for the subsequent time-lapse inversions, i.e.…”
Section: Data Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the ''true'' subsurface resistivity distribution, we inverted the apparent resistivity data using the iterative tomographic inversion scheme of the RES2DINV software (Loke and Barker, 1995). To minimize artefacts produced by numerical inaccuracies from inverting each dataset separately, the time-lapse inversion method was applied which uses a common reference model to jointly invert datasets from different dates (Loke, 2013;Singha et al, 2014). We inverted the first dataset collected on 8 November 2012 to produce the starting and reference model for the subsequent time-lapse inversions, i.e.…”
Section: Data Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physics behind the two measurement techniques are different. NMR measurements are mainly dominated by the water content in the subsurface, whereas ERT data are dependent on different subsurface state variables (Singha et al, ). Although an Archie's type conversion from resistivity to water content is an empirical approximation (Singha & Gorelick, ), this method is an accepted standard method in hydrogeophysical analyses, especially with time‐lapse ERT (Singha et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum possible temporal resolution of time‐lapse tomograms is the time it takes to complete one survey, which is 35 min for the Supersting R8. Time‐lapse tomograms have been found to be more accurate than individual resistivity tomograms because systematic errors are minimized and physical properties of the subsurface, such as lithology, and porosity, are held constant (Kemna et al, ; Samouёlian, Cousin, Tabbagh, Bruand, & Richard, , Miller, Routh, Brosten, & McNamara, , Singha et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%