2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL

Abstract: The techniques available for the interrogation and analysis of neuroimaging data have a large influence in determining the flexibility, sensitivity and scope of neuroimaging experiments. The development of such methodologies has allowed investigators to address scientific questions which could not previously be answered and, as such, has become an important research area in its own right.In this paper, we present a review of the research carried out by the Analysis Group at the Oxford Centre for Functional MRI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

17
9,530
1
15

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11,927 publications
(9,807 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
17
9,530
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Acquisition parameters were TE = 88 ms, TR = 13 s and voxel size 2 × 2 × 2 mm (Siemens); TE = 56ms and TR = 11s and voxel size 1.96 × 1.96 × 2.75 mm (Philips). The diffusion data were preprocessed using standard FSL pipelines (Smith et al, 2004). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acquisition parameters were TE = 88 ms, TR = 13 s and voxel size 2 × 2 × 2 mm (Siemens); TE = 56ms and TR = 11s and voxel size 1.96 × 1.96 × 2.75 mm (Philips). The diffusion data were preprocessed using standard FSL pipelines (Smith et al, 2004). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural data were analyzed with FSL‐VBM, an optimized voxel‐based morphometry style analysis 32 carried out with FSL tools 33, which allows to detect potential differences in the local gray matter volume between different groups of subjects. In a first step, structural images were brain‐extracted using BET 34.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding intensity normalization and tissue segmentation, both SPM and SIENAX use an integrated approach to this process (Ashburner & Friston, 2005; Smith et al., 2004; Zhang, Brady, & Smith, 2001). One advantage to using whole‐brain atrophy as a metric is its relative insensitivity to GM and WM tissue misclassification, as these two measures are summated to yield whole‐brain volumes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the BPV pipeline, raw MDEFT images were resliced to the axial plane, followed by removal of all slices inferior to the cervico‐medullary junction using JIM v7 (http://www.xinapse.com). Images then underwent automated segmentation and template normalization using SIENAX, (Smith et al., 2002) part of FSL (v5.0) (Smith et al., 2004) using a previously optimized brain extraction tool (BET) threshold of 0.2 (Chu et al., 2016). T2‐hyperintense lesion volumes were obtained by expert semiautomated segmentation with an edge‐finding tool based on local image intensity thresholds using JIM (v5) as previously published (Dell'Oglio et al., 2015); manual corrections were applied as needed (Ceccarelli et al., 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%