2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0558-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in Craniosynostosis Research and Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 224 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the first attempts to treat skulls deformed by craniosynostoses, restoration of the stenotic line expandability (pri mary defect) and remodeling the areas of compensatory deformation (secondary defect) have been the main concerns. In the evolutionary history of the treatment of craniosynostoses, we reviewed extensive and morbid craniectomies and suturectomies that possibly involved the interposition of materials or caustic substances in an attempt to inhibit the recurrence of early suture closure 3,4 through distraction osteogenesis using external distractors 5 and skullcap re mo deling 1 . Such remodeling, the preferred practice still to day, follows various types of osteotomies, but all involve craniotomy using dural detachment, back table remodeling of the osteotomized cap, and its return as a graft fixed with varied materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first attempts to treat skulls deformed by craniosynostoses, restoration of the stenotic line expandability (pri mary defect) and remodeling the areas of compensatory deformation (secondary defect) have been the main concerns. In the evolutionary history of the treatment of craniosynostoses, we reviewed extensive and morbid craniectomies and suturectomies that possibly involved the interposition of materials or caustic substances in an attempt to inhibit the recurrence of early suture closure 3,4 through distraction osteogenesis using external distractors 5 and skullcap re mo deling 1 . Such remodeling, the preferred practice still to day, follows various types of osteotomies, but all involve craniotomy using dural detachment, back table remodeling of the osteotomized cap, and its return as a graft fixed with varied materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rabbits have been widely used as experimental model in studies of behavior of cranial sutures, intracranial pressure, craniometric variations, evolution of fixation materials, and distraction of craniofacial structures (Mabbutt and Kokich 1979;Persson, Roy et al 1979;Alberius and Selvik 1983a;Alberius, Selvik et al 1986;Persing, Babler et al 1986;Alberius, Malmberg et al 1990;Smith, Mooney et al 1996;Singhal, Mooney et al 1997;Losken, Mooney et al 1998;Mooney, Siegel et al 1999;Wendy, Fellows-Mayle et al 2000;Gewalli, Guimaraes-Ferreira et al 2001;Putz, Smith et al 2001;Abreu 2002;David, Gewalli et al 2002;Gosain, Santoro et al 2002;David, Proffer et al 2004;Guimarães-Ferreira, Miguéns et al 2004;Cooper, Singhal et al 2006;Cardoso, Cançado et al 2007;Davis, Windh et al 2008;Davis, Windh et al 2009). Cerebral growth curve of rabbit specimens is similar to those of newborn human children: craniofacial growth in rabbits is accelareted immediately after birth, progressively decreasing from two to thirty-four weeks of age (Alberius, Selvik et al 1986;Abreu 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a time when cranial malformations were considered a result of divine or supernatural reasons and there are pictures of Chinese gods that display tall heads or great projections in their frontal region. (Guimarães-Ferreira, Miguéns et al 2004) To such an extent that this intentional cranial deformation became part of the culture of ancient peoples. In the Americas, cases dated 8000 BC and this tradition only ceased in 1752 under the Spanish colonial domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Iliad, Homer describes the warrior Thersites as "the ugliest man who came before Troy…his head ran up to a point..," a description characteristic of oxycephaly. 20 The recognition of cranial vault deformities by the ancient physician Galen, and some early understanding of the role of cranial sutures by Hippocrates, have also been reported. 6,55 By the 16th century, it appears that anatomists appreciated the existence of cranial sutures and had documented a broad range of the characteristics of the deformity, from an appreciation of suture pattern and premature suture fusion in a variety of configurations by Hundt,21 specific abnormal varieties of sagittal and coronal sutures by Dryander,13 and what would now be described as oxycephaly and brachycephaly by della Croce 10 and Vesalius 58 (Fig.…”
Section: Early Descriptions Of Cranial Deformitymentioning
confidence: 95%