Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Having explored many methods to improve efficiencies in conventional drilling processes, operators in the traditional North American land market are ever more attracted to innovative and cost effective means to drill wells. These innovative operators have turned to coiled tubing directional drilling (CTDD), with its promising inherent efficiencies in tripping and connection times, and with its smaller, logistically simpler footprint to optimize the drilling process even further. New downhole drilling technologies found in the conventional drilling arena are being applied to this operation to overcome the intrinsic limitations associated with the non-traditional slide-only drilling method associated with coiled tubing drilling. Together with innovative modifications to traditional CT rigs to address the fit-for-purpose needs of drilling, this novel approach to cost reduction is being applied in a cost-sensitive land market in the Rocky Mountain region of the US. This paper provides an overview of the drilling application faced by the operator, of the specialized hybrid Coil Tubing drilling rig and of the novel application utilizing the modern, non-rotating rib-steering downhole drilling tools. The paper will benchmark the performance of the built-for-purpose operation compared to previous wells drilled with conventional rigs and directional motors, as well as other CTD systems. Additionally, a well to well performance of the drilling operation over a multi-well period will be evaluated, together with a discussion on lessons learned and a presentation of potential future improvements. The application of automated drilling systems with coiled tubing drilling heralds in a new age in developmental drilling in low spread cost markets. Overview Traditional drilling in North America is increasingly focused on developing natural gas reservoirs, whether they are conventional sandstone formations or unconventional shale plays. One of the most popular basins in recent years for unconventional shale and tight sands gas has been the Piceance Basin. The Piceance Basin is a geologic structural depression trending northwest - southeast in northwestern Colorado, in the United States (see figure 1). The basin is more than 100 miles (161 km) long and has an average width of over 60 miles (96.5 km), encompassing an area of approximately 7,110 square miles (18,415 sq. km). It includes geologic formations from Cambrian to Holocene in age, but the thickest section is comprised of rocks from the Cretaceous Period. The basin contains reserves of coal, natural gas, and oil shale. The basin has come to increasing public attention in recent years because of widespread drilling to extract natural gas. The primary target of gas development has been the Williams Fork Formation of the Mesaverde Group, or Cretaceous age. The Williams Fork is a several-thousand-foot thick section of shale, sandstone and coal deposited in a coastal plain environment. The formation has long been known to contain natural gas (see figure 2). However, the sandstone reservoirs have low permeability and limited areal extent, which made gas wells uneconomic in the past. Advances in hydraulic fracturing technology within the past decade, along with higher natural gas prices, have made gas wells broadly economic in the area. (Wikipedia 2007), (Colorado Geologic Survey 2007)
Having explored many methods to improve efficiencies in conventional drilling processes, operators in the traditional North American land market are ever more attracted to innovative and cost effective means to drill wells. These innovative operators have turned to coiled tubing directional drilling (CTDD), with its promising inherent efficiencies in tripping and connection times, and with its smaller, logistically simpler footprint to optimize the drilling process even further. New downhole drilling technologies found in the conventional drilling arena are being applied to this operation to overcome the intrinsic limitations associated with the non-traditional slide-only drilling method associated with coiled tubing drilling. Together with innovative modifications to traditional CT rigs to address the fit-for-purpose needs of drilling, this novel approach to cost reduction is being applied in a cost-sensitive land market in the Rocky Mountain region of the US. This paper provides an overview of the drilling application faced by the operator, of the specialized hybrid Coil Tubing drilling rig and of the novel application utilizing the modern, non-rotating rib-steering downhole drilling tools. The paper will benchmark the performance of the built-for-purpose operation compared to previous wells drilled with conventional rigs and directional motors, as well as other CTD systems. Additionally, a well to well performance of the drilling operation over a multi-well period will be evaluated, together with a discussion on lessons learned and a presentation of potential future improvements. The application of automated drilling systems with coiled tubing drilling heralds in a new age in developmental drilling in low spread cost markets. Overview Traditional drilling in North America is increasingly focused on developing natural gas reservoirs, whether they are conventional sandstone formations or unconventional shale plays. One of the most popular basins in recent years for unconventional shale and tight sands gas has been the Piceance Basin. The Piceance Basin is a geologic structural depression trending northwest - southeast in northwestern Colorado, in the United States (see figure 1). The basin is more than 100 miles (161 km) long and has an average width of over 60 miles (96.5 km), encompassing an area of approximately 7,110 square miles (18,415 sq. km). It includes geologic formations from Cambrian to Holocene in age, but the thickest section is comprised of rocks from the Cretaceous Period. The basin contains reserves of coal, natural gas, and oil shale. The basin has come to increasing public attention in recent years because of widespread drilling to extract natural gas. The primary target of gas development has been the Williams Fork Formation of the Mesaverde Group, or Cretaceous age. The Williams Fork is a several-thousand-foot thick section of shale, sandstone and coal deposited in a coastal plain environment. The formation has long been known to contain natural gas (see figure 2). However, the sandstone reservoirs have low permeability and limited areal extent, which made gas wells uneconomic in the past. Advances in hydraulic fracturing technology within the past decade, along with higher natural gas prices, have made gas wells broadly economic in the area. (Wikipedia 2007), (Colorado Geologic Survey 2007)
Technology improvements are continuing to expand the capability of coiled tubing directional drilling (CTDD) worldwide. Increased CTDD activity in advanced underbalanced re-entry applications that require precise wellbore (multilateral) placement and real-time monitoring of downhole parameters has led to the development of bottom-hole drilling assemblies (BHAs) with enhanced functionality. Saudi Aramco identified CTDD as an important technology for redeveloping its gas reserves and is dedicated to expanding the technical limit of CTDD application. Saudi Aramco successfully completed its first underbalanced re-entry coiled tubing drilling (UBCTD) pilot project and is now progressing to consolidate this technology in subsequent UBCTD operations. A great impetus has now been placed on further improving UBCTD project economics through improved operational efficiency and the introduction of new underbalanced coiled tubing drilling techniques and services. This paper provides an overview of the new Rib Steered Motor (RSM) technology and its potential benefits to UBCTD. It details recent worldwide deployments of the rib steering motor technology focusing on operations in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia which provide the perfect testing ground when geosteering with RSM. Future advances using UBCTD geosteering technology rely on a close working relationship between the field operator and the service company. Successful application of UBCTD applys to a wide range of mature oil and gas fields for enhancing access to the producing reservoir to drive the economic extraction of additional reserves.
Summary Microhole–horizontal–well–drilling technology is a high–efficiency and low–cost technology that has developed rapidly in recent years. However, during microhole–horizontal–well drilling, cuttings deposit easily at the bottom of the wellbore because of gravity and nonrotation of the pipe. The pipe sliding on the cuttings bed will cause extremely serious friction between the pipe and cuttings bed, which is an important limiting factor on the extended length of the microhole horizontal wellbore. Therefore, it is necessary to study the influencing factors and establish a model for evaluating the friction between the pipe and cuttings bed. In this study, laboratory experiments on the sliding friction between pipe and cuttings bed were conducted. By analyzing the comprehensive sliding–friction coefficient (CSFC) between the pipe and cuttings bed, the effects of dimensionless buried depth (0.2 to 1.0) and average cuttings size (0.249 to 2.667 mm) on the CSFC between the pipe and cuttings bed were obtained. CSFC is a function of dimensionless buried depth and relative roughness in the developed model. The results suggest that the sliding–friction resistance between the pipe and cuttings bed increases as the buried depth of pipe increases or the average cuttings size decreases. We propose a model for estimating the CSFC using experimental data and the least–squares method. The predictions show good agreement with the experimental data within suitable ranges of models. This work is expected to provide the basis for predicting the friction resistance between the pipe and cuttings bed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.