2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2019.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in Auto-Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
254
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(255 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
1
254
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed analysis of dose-volume-toxicity relationships for an array of cardiac sub-structures requires contouring with sufficient quality, a task typically performed by expert radiation oncologists. This process is time consuming (up to several hours/patient for complex structures arrays [7]) and inter-user variability and manual errors performed during the contouring process may bias results as reported by Caravatta et al [8]. It is important to highlight that the inter-observer variability is always an issue also in judgment of automatic contours generated, for example, by contour propagation techniques; these will include the potential biases too in addition to the uncertainty in the registrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed analysis of dose-volume-toxicity relationships for an array of cardiac sub-structures requires contouring with sufficient quality, a task typically performed by expert radiation oncologists. This process is time consuming (up to several hours/patient for complex structures arrays [7]) and inter-user variability and manual errors performed during the contouring process may bias results as reported by Caravatta et al [8]. It is important to highlight that the inter-observer variability is always an issue also in judgment of automatic contours generated, for example, by contour propagation techniques; these will include the potential biases too in addition to the uncertainty in the registrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of MR imaging in radiotherapy continues to rapidly grow as this modality provides improved soft tissue contrast when compared to CT imaging. With greater use of MR imaging in radiotherapy as well as the advent of adaptive and online MR‐guided radiotherapy, there has been an increasing need for real‐time automated solutions that generate accurate segmentations resulting in the development of novel and more innovative auto‐segmentation approaches . In this work we introduce the first dedicated dataset for the evaluation of T2‐weighted MR imaging auto‐segmentation algorithms for head and neck salivary glands and lymph node levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include automation of treatment planning [31], adaptive radiotherapy, MR-linac systems [32], biological and functional imaging [33], dose painting [34], radiomics [35], dosiomics [36], and predictive modelling [37]. There is also a wide range of topics investigated with artificial intelligence (neural networks, deep learning [38,39]), including segmentation of tumors and OARs [40], pseudo-CT generation from MRI [41], dose prediction for treatment planning [42], patient-specific quality assurance [43], real-time respiratory motion prediction [44], and prediction of treatment response [45].…”
Section: Computational Methods and Automationmentioning
confidence: 99%