Advances in Food Authenticity Testing 2016
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100220-9.00014-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in Authenticity Testing for Meat Speciation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA-based methods have been considered as the most suitable tools for unequivocal species identification in animal products and processed foods (Amaral, Meira, Oliveira, & Mafra, 2016). Compared to proteinbased methods, they present several advantages such as the higher stability of nucleic acids and their ubiquity in every type of cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DNA-based methods have been considered as the most suitable tools for unequivocal species identification in animal products and processed foods (Amaral, Meira, Oliveira, & Mafra, 2016). Compared to proteinbased methods, they present several advantages such as the higher stability of nucleic acids and their ubiquity in every type of cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both reports rely on extensive sequencing analysis, which is not a cost-effective and highthroughput approach. In contrast, the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with species-specific primers is one of the most used approaches for authentication purposes due to its low cost, simplicity, fastness, high specificity and sensitivity, enabling species identification even in complex and processed foods (Amaral et al, 2015;Amaral et al, 2016). Real-time PCR with high resolution melting (HRM) analysis can be regarded as a cost-effective alternative and reliable tool to exploit DNA barcoding because it does not require further sequencing analysis (Fernandes, Costa, Oliveira, & Mafra, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume of qPCR data is increasing, along with the urgent need for qPCR data integration and centralized documentation. In the past decade, qPCR has been utilized as a tool to support numerous biological fields of inquiry, including natural resource management ( Thomas et al, 2019 ; Fritts et al, 2019 ), food safety ( Amaral et al, 2016 ), conservation planning ( Franklin et al, 2019 ), and disease vector/infectious disease monitoring ( Qurollo et al, 2017 ; Ikten et al, 2016 ). Research using qPCR methodologies extends beyond the detection and quantification of target gene expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA-based methods provide a choice of analysis of meat species in processed food based on the fact that the nucleic acids present in every cell type are more stable than protein . [7,8] Most of DNAbased methods rely on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) due to its simplicity, fast, not complex, not involving extensive sample preparation which allows identification of meat type, even in processed and complex food matrix. The use of species-specific primer in combination with restriction fragment length polymorphism has been applied for identification of pork in meat-based foods such as meatball [9] and nugget products in Indonesia .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%