2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.1162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in Audio-Based Systems to Monitor Patient Adherence and Inhaler Drug Delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these studies mostly recruited either small patient cohorts or small cohorts of healthy participants and did not objectively detect the presence of critical user technique errors such as poor actuation coordination and inhaling too fast during pMDI use. There may be challenges, however, in accurately estimating the inhalation flow rate from pMDIs using audio-methods due to the limited acoustic energy generated in pMDIs during inhalation 36 , 37 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies mostly recruited either small patient cohorts or small cohorts of healthy participants and did not objectively detect the presence of critical user technique errors such as poor actuation coordination and inhaling too fast during pMDI use. There may be challenges, however, in accurately estimating the inhalation flow rate from pMDIs using audio-methods due to the limited acoustic energy generated in pMDIs during inhalation 36 , 37 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 28 Digital technologies are also being used to measure adherence in real time for other diseases, such as COPD. 29 The question remains, however, whether prescribers in the real world would act on information about patient non-adherence and appropriately adjust patterns of treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a step forward data-driven approaches learn by example from features and distributions found in the data. Taylor et al [26] compared Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based classifiers using MFCC, Linear Predictive Coding, ZCR and CWT features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A year later, Holmes et al [18,19], also, developed an algorithm that recognizes blister events and breath events (with an accuracy of 92.1%) and separates inhalations from exhalations (with an accuracy of more than 90%). Later, Taylor et al developed two main algorithms for blister detection [26,37] based on Quadratic Discriminant Analysis and ANN, and achieved an accuracy of 88.2% and 65.6%, respectively. Nousias et al in Reference [13] presented a comparative study between Random Forest, ADABoost, Support Vector Machines and Gaussian Mixture Models, reaching the conclusion that RF and GMM yield a 97% to 98% classification accuracy on the examined dataset, when utilizing MFCC, Spectrogram and Cepstrogram features.…”
Section: Comparison With Relevant Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%