Advances in Additive Manufacturing and Its Numerical Modelling

Ahmad, Shadab; Rab, Shanay; Soni, Hargovind

doi:10.1007/978-981-99-2074-7_136

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recent studies and reviews have also focused on downstream methods used for surface finishing of FDM components (Hashmi et al, 2023a). To enable the optimization of product characteristics at the pre-processing stage, recent studies have analyzed numerical-analytical modeling and artificial intelligent approaches that can forecast whether the AM component/ product can meet desired mechanical and design criteria (Ahmad et al, 2023;Tayyab et al, 2023;Hashmi et al, 2023b).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Using extrusion-based 3D printing technology to investigate the impact of changing print conditions on tensile characteristics

Viswanath,

Hiremath,

Chiniwar

2024

RPJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this study, most recent advancements in threedimensional (3D) printing have focused on the fabrication of components. It is typical to use different print settings, such as raster angle, infill and orientation to improve the 3D component qualities while fabricating the sample using a 3D printer. However, the influence of these factors on the characteristics of the 3D parts has not been well explored. Owing to the effect of the different print parameters in fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology, it is necessary to evaluate the strength of the parts manufactured using 3D printing technology. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the effect of three print parameters − raster angle, build orientation and infill − on the tensile characteristics of 3D-printed components made of three distinct materials − acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA), polycarbonate ABS (PC-ABS) and ULTEM-9085 − was investigated. A variety of test items were created using a commercially accessible 3D printer in various configurations, including raster angle (0°, 45°), (0°, 90°), (45°, −45°), (45°, 90°), infill density (solid, sparse, sparse double dense) and orientation (flat, on-edge). Findings The outcome shows that variations in tensile strength and force are brought on by the effects of various printing conditions. In all possible combinations of the print settings, ULTEM 9085 material has a higher tensile strength than ASA and PC-ABS materials. ULTEM 9085 material’s on-edge orientation, sparse infill, and raster angle of (0°, −45°) resulted in the greatest overall tensile strength of 73.72 MPa. The highest load-bearing strength of ULTEM material was attained with the same procedure, measuring at 2,932 N. The tensile strength of the materials is higher in the on-edge orientation than in the flat orientation. The tensile strength of all three materials is highest for solid infill with a flat orientation and a raster angle of (45°, −45°). All three materials show higher tensile strength with a raster angle of (45°, −45°) compared to other angles. The sparse double-dense material promotes stronger tensile properties than sparse infill. Thus, the strength of additive components is influenced by the combination of selected print parameters. As a result, these factors interact with one another to produce a high-quality product. Originality/value The outcomes of this study can serve as a reference point for researchers, manufacturers and users of 3D-printed polymer material (PC-ABS, ASA, ULTEM 9085) components seeking to optimize FDM printing parameters for tensile strength and/or identify materials suitable for intended tensile characteristics.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…, 2023a). To enable the optimization of product characteristics at the pre-processing stage, recent studies have analyzed numerical-analytical modeling and artificial intelligent approaches that can forecast whether the AM component/product can meet desired mechanical and design criteria (Ahmad et al. , 2023; Tayyab et al.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%