London 2013, 75th Eage Conference en Exhibition Incorporating SPE Europec 2013
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20130125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in 3D Potential Field Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, our inverse problem formulation is based on a mixed scheme that combines a stochastic optimization technique known as Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMAES) (Hansen & Ostermeier, 2001), with McMC methods (e.g., Mosegaard & Tarantola, 1995). Although the use of CMAES in geophysics is not common, it has been implemented in recent studies as a global minimization method (Alvers et al, 2013;Diouane, 2014;Fonseca et al, 2014;Grayver et al, , 2017Shen et al, 2015) outperforming other techniques such as genetic algorithms and particle Although the use of CMAES in geophysics is not common, it has been implemented in recent studies as a global minimization method (Alvers et al, 2013;Diouane, 2014;Fonseca et al, 2014;Grayver et al, , 2017Shen et al, 2015) outperforming other techniques such as genetic algorithms and particle…”
Section: Stochastic Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, our inverse problem formulation is based on a mixed scheme that combines a stochastic optimization technique known as Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMAES) (Hansen & Ostermeier, 2001), with McMC methods (e.g., Mosegaard & Tarantola, 1995). Although the use of CMAES in geophysics is not common, it has been implemented in recent studies as a global minimization method (Alvers et al, 2013;Diouane, 2014;Fonseca et al, 2014;Grayver et al, , 2017Shen et al, 2015) outperforming other techniques such as genetic algorithms and particle Although the use of CMAES in geophysics is not common, it has been implemented in recent studies as a global minimization method (Alvers et al, 2013;Diouane, 2014;Fonseca et al, 2014;Grayver et al, , 2017Shen et al, 2015) outperforming other techniques such as genetic algorithms and particle…”
Section: Stochastic Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMAES explores the model space globally and exhibits a remarkable robustness on ill-conditioned problems (Hansen et al, 2011). Although the use of CMAES in geophysics is not common, it has been implemented in recent studies as a global minimization method (Alvers et al, 2013;Diouane, 2014;Fonseca et al, 2014;Grayver et al, , 2017Shen et al, 2015) outperforming other techniques such as genetic algorithms and particle Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 10.1002/2017JB014691 Swarm optimization (Arsenault et al, 2013;Auger et al, 2009;Elshall et al, 2015). Additionally, showed that the use of CMAES for finding regions of low misfit can improve performance of conventional McMC methods.…”
Section: Stochastic Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique aims to explore the model space globally showing remarkable robustness on ill‐conditioned problems (Hansen et al, ). The use of CMAES in geophysics is not common, but has recently been implemented as a global minimization method (Alvers et al, ; Diouane, ; Grayver et al, ; Munch et al, ; Shen et al, ) outperforming other optimization techniques such as Genetic Algorithms and Particle Swarm Optimization (Arsenault et al, ; Auger et al, ; Elshall et al, ).…”
Section: Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%