Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancement of the midface, from conventional Le Fort III osteotomy to Le Fort III distraction: review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the maxilla and midface movements are confronted, it is necessary to perform the Le Fort I associated with the Le Fort III osteotomy. Le Fort I osteotomy association is also especially useful in cases in which there is a difference in the extent of the midface hypoplasia in the orbital region in relation to a maxillo-mandibular discrepancy 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the maxilla and midface movements are confronted, it is necessary to perform the Le Fort I associated with the Le Fort III osteotomy. Le Fort I osteotomy association is also especially useful in cases in which there is a difference in the extent of the midface hypoplasia in the orbital region in relation to a maxillo-mandibular discrepancy 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it minimizes the advancement in the Le Fort III osteotomy, reducing the need for bone grafts [14][15] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method was applied to a 7-year-old Apert craniosynostosis patient. Lefort III osteotomies were associated with internal distraction devices for the midface advancement (Nout et al;). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The senior maxillofacial surgeon (GS) performed all of the 13 surgical craniofacial osteotomies and facial advancements, with collaboration by the neurosurgeon who operated on the cranial vault. The surgical technique was chosen based on the personal experience of the surgeon, by comparing surgical techniques reported in the literature (Ortiz-Monasterio et al, 1978;Nout et al, 2008;Nada et al, 2010;Laure et al, 2014).…”
Section: Surgical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%