Advanced User Interfaces for Upper Limb Functional Electrical Stimulation

Corbett, Elaine A.; Éthier, Christian; Oby, Emily R.; Kording, Konrad; Perreault, Eric J.; Miller, Lee E.

doi:10.1002/9781118628522.ch19

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 103 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Knowledge of target location has also been used to improve trajectory prediction both in simulation [29,30] and during real-time control [5,31,32]. These approaches use probabilistic mixtures of continuous trajectory models to combine the benefits of discrete target identification with the desire to provide some level of continuous control to the user.…”

Section: Strategies To Optimize Target Acquisitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Brain-state classification and a dual-state decoder dramatically improve the control of cursor movement through a brain-machine interface

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective It is quite remarkable that Brain Machine Interfaces (BMIs) can be used to control complex movements with fewer than 100 neurons. Success may be due in part to the limited range of dynamical conditions under which most BMIs are tested. Achieving high-quality control that spans these conditions with a single linear mapping will be more challenging. Even for simple reaching movements, existing BMIs must reduce the stochastic noise of neurons by averaging the control signals over time, instead of over the many neurons that normally control movement. This forces a compromise between a decoder with dynamics allowing rapid movement and one that allows postures to be maintained with little jitter. Our current work presents a method for addressing this compromise, which may also generalize to more highly varied dynamical situations, including movements with more greatly varying speed. Approach We have developed a system that uses two independent Weiner filters as individual components in a single decoder, one optimized for movement, and the other for postural control. We computed an LDA classifier using the same neural inputs. The classifier combined the outputs of the two filters in proportion to the likelihood assigned by the classifier to each state. Main results We have performed online experiments with two monkeys using this neural-classifier, dual-state decoder, comparing it to a standard, single-state decoder as well as to a dual-state decoder that switched states automatically based on the cursor’s proximity to a target. The performance of both monkeys using the classifier decoder was markedly better than that of the single-state decoder and comparable to the proximity decoder. Significance We have demonstrated a novel strategy for dealing with the need to make rapid movements while also maintaining precise cursor control when approaching and stabilizing within targets. Further gains can undoubtedly be realized by optimizing the performance of the individual movement and posture decoders.

show abstract