1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8662-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Technical Ceramics Directory and Databook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The permittivity of the perovskite well is based on the reported values for bulk materials: 25.5 for methylammonium lead-bromide 52 , 30 for lead-bromide 69 , and 41 for cesium lead-bromide 70 . We set the permittivity of the barrier to be 4.08, based on the permittivity of hexylamine 69 ; of PMMA to 3.0 71 ; of SiO 2 to 4.2 69 ; of ZrO 2 to 12.5 69 ; and of Al 2 O 3 to 9.1 72 . The field strengths over the perovskite and within the wells are provided in Supplementary Table 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The permittivity of the perovskite well is based on the reported values for bulk materials: 25.5 for methylammonium lead-bromide 52 , 30 for lead-bromide 69 , and 41 for cesium lead-bromide 70 . We set the permittivity of the barrier to be 4.08, based on the permittivity of hexylamine 69 ; of PMMA to 3.0 71 ; of SiO 2 to 4.2 69 ; of ZrO 2 to 12.5 69 ; and of Al 2 O 3 to 9.1 72 . The field strengths over the perovskite and within the wells are provided in Supplementary Table 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of ε SiC = 10.2, ε mullite = 5.8, and n SiC = 2.55, n mullite = 1.654 for SiC and mullite are taken from literature and Hamaker constants were calculated by taking relaxation frequency value as ω = 2 × 10 16 rad/s . From the known concentration of the electrolyte, the value of “κ” for the SiC‐mullite system was determined to be 0.803 × 10 9 /m.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tool-specimen friction coefficient is assumed to be 0.2 (the friction coefficient of most ceramics is in the range of 0.1-0.3). 37 The machining sample in the simulation has a width of 2 mm and a height of 1 mm, and the assembly contains 9623 particles.…”
Section: Numerical Modeling Of the Orthogonal Cutting Processmentioning
confidence: 99%