2018 25th International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ict.2018.8464920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Resource Allocation Technique for a Fair Downlink Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access System

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, a novel resource allocation technique is proposed for a power-domain non-orthogonal multiple access scheme using successive interference cancellation in a downlink cellular system. It aims at providing a flexible balancing between throughput and fairness maximization and incorporates unequal power repartition among allocated subbands using waterfilling. Its main strength is the ability to achieve a high level of fairness in every scheduling slot, therefore improving the quality of exper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, we have also introduced a new metric called Flexible Throughput vs. Fairness Maximization Metric (FTFMM) [15] in order to cope with applications where throughput versus fairness maximization is essential. FTFMM aims at striking a flexible balancing between throughput and fairness, since it is based on the instantaneous rate on the considered subband s f , the current user rates on the so far attributed subbands within the current allocation slot and on the historical rates of each possible candidate.…”
Section: User Pairing and Power Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later, we have also introduced a new metric called Flexible Throughput vs. Fairness Maximization Metric (FTFMM) [15] in order to cope with applications where throughput versus fairness maximization is essential. FTFMM aims at striking a flexible balancing between throughput and fairness, since it is based on the instantaneous rate on the considered subband s f , the current user rates on the so far attributed subbands within the current allocation slot and on the historical rates of each possible candidate.…”
Section: User Pairing and Power Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When fairness among users is to be evaluated within each scheduling slot, shortterm fairness is considered and r k is equal to R k (t), the actual achieved throughput of user k during scheduling slot t. Fig. 1 compares the capacity of a NOMA system using the approach proposed in [15] with OMA and NOMA systems based on conventional PF scheduling, as a function of the number of subbands. When different couples of parameters a and b values are evaluated, as expected, the capacity is maximized for a = 0 and b = 1 (upper throughput bound), decreases progressively when a increases and b decreases, and reaches its lowest value for a = 1 and b = 0.…”
Section: B Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gini index does not offer information about particular attack kinds or methodologies because it primarily concentrates on resource distribution [80]. Furthermore, the accuracy and dependability of resource allocation data have a direct impact on the Gini index's validity and effectiveness as an attack-detection tool [81].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%