Advanced Relativity: Unification of Space, Matter and Consciousness

Self Cite

The Minkowski formula X4=ict indicates that time t does not express the 4th dimension of space-time, i.e., X4 is not t. Therefore, Minkowski space-time is not a 3D+T manifold, it is 4D. The 4D manifold has 4 spatial dimensions and is timeless, in the sense that it does not contain some physical time in which material changes run. In physics we experience the timelessness of 4D space as "Einstein's Now." From this perspective, the time that we measure with clocks is just the sequential numerical order of changes, i.e. motions that run in the timeless space of Now. On the other hand, past and future are nothing more than psychological or conceptual realities that derive from the neuronal activity of the brain. Therefore, "time flow" and "arrow of time" have only a mathematical existence.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 85%

Minkowski Space-time and Einstein’s Now Conundrum

Šorli¹,

Kaufman²,

Fiscaletti³

2018

Self Cite

“…Advanced Relativity (AR) is familiar with this view: consciousness is a photon with an infinite frequency and exists in n-dimensional Hilbert space. By lowering the frequency in lower dimensional Hilbert spaces, this "photonconsciousness" becomes mind and finally, in 3D reality, it becomes matter (Sorli et al, 2016). Matter has an inherent tendency to develop into life, and to develop further into intelligent organisms, throughout the entire universe, because matter exists in consciousness (Sorli et al, 2017c).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Experimential Methodology in Consciousness Research

Šorli¹,

Kaufman²

2018

Self Cite

Consciousness research of the last few decades approaches consciousness using classical research methodology, namely, as if consciousness was an object similar to quantum fields or elementary particles. This approach is not able to grasp the subjective aspect of consciousness, namely, one has the ability to observe, to be conscious of how one's mind is creating a scientific model of consciousness. Experiential methodology, on the other hand, focuses on the subject which is observing the mind working on the model of consciousness. It allows you to experience the source of the observation, which seems is consciousness itself. Consciousness research requires the enlargement of scientific research methodology in which experience has the same scientific validity as the measurement. We cannot directly measure the experience of the source of our observation, however, we can experience it and our experience is real. Conceiving a subjective experience as "non-scientific" is the main obstacle of today's science because it is excluding "the observer-the one who has the experience" out of the scientific picture of the world. The aim of this article is to include human experience as data whose value is of the same ontological importance as data obtained by measurement.

“…One could ask: How it is possible that space has such a high energy density and we cannot detect it? The answer is as follows: the energy of space is the primordial energy of the universe, and syntropy is one of its characteristics (Sorli et al, 2016;Sorli et al, 2017b). Protons, electrons, and photons are vortexes made of this syntropic energy, which is what allows them to have such an extended lifetime.…”

Section: Variable Energy Density Of Space and Vortex Model Of Elementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bijective Analysis of Physical Equations and Physical Models

Šorli¹

2018

Self Cite

is a function between the elements of two sets, where each element of one set is paired with exactly one element of the other set, and where each element of the other set is paired with exactly one element of the first set. We can define every physical equation as the set X and the corresponding physical reality that the equation describes as the set Y. Every element in a given equation is an element in the set X, and each element in set X should have exactly one paired element in the set Y. The bijective analysis confirms that Newtonian physics satisfies the bijective function. On the other hand, not all of the equations in the Theory of Relativity satisfy the bijective function. Additionally, the Higgs mechanism does not satisfy the bijective function.