2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/5109394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced QoS Provisioning and Mobile Fog Computing for 5G

Abstract: This paper presents a novel QoS and mobile cloud and fog computing framework for future fifth generation (5G) of mobile and fixed nodes with radio network aggregation capability. The proposed 5G framework is leading to high QoS provisioning for any given multimedia service, higher bandwidth utilization, traffic load sharing, mobile cloud plus fog computing features, and multi-radio interface capabilities. The framework is user-centric, targeted at always-on connectivity with using radio network aggregation for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By structure, Fog computing is potentially viable to inject QoS/QoE guarantees by providing local accesses to the users rather than communicating every time to the Cloud. In literature, various issues like energy-efficient design, latency, and minimizing congestion as a whole are explored in a reactive (as and when demand comes) or a proactive (in hindsight) manner in general [21,28,29] or considering particular application in mind [30,31].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By structure, Fog computing is potentially viable to inject QoS/QoE guarantees by providing local accesses to the users rather than communicating every time to the Cloud. In literature, various issues like energy-efficient design, latency, and minimizing congestion as a whole are explored in a reactive (as and when demand comes) or a proactive (in hindsight) manner in general [21,28,29] or considering particular application in mind [30,31].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We try to deploy service on device which has the minimal service response time. This is regulated in (16).…”
Section: Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, fog computing is appropriate for applications which are not only processed on the middle computing networks to meet low latency requirement but also processed on cloudy-level for complex, difficult requirements. Therefore, others try to prove that fog computing and its characteristics are effective on many specified applications, e.g., improving healthcare systems and their performance [11][12][13], vehicular networks and road safety [14,15], provisioning 5G mobile networks [16,17], surveillance video stream processing [18], and saving energy in cloud computing [19]. Finally, others focus on specified problems in fog computing environment, e.g., survey on security issues [20,21], building security schema [22,23], and building simulation framework named iFogSim [24] and MyiFogSim [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it would result in heavy traffic burden over the transmission network and large responding latency, since the cloud servers are far away from end users. By deploying fog servers for providing supplementary resources between cloud and users, mobile fog computing (MFC) is designed as a novel computing paradigm in order to reduce responding latency of services and avoid traffic congestion of network [5]. Hence, in the cloud-aware MFC network [6], most services of users can be performed at the fog servers and others at the cloud servers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%