Advanced Power Generation Using a Nitrogen Turbine Engine Instead of a Conventional Injection Steam Turbine Engine

Abstract

An ever-increasing demand for electrical power and soaring levels of energy consumption around the world have led to an energy crisis. Thus, this paper aims to review the conventional technologies against those of newer developments in electrical power generation such as using nitrogen generators. The nitrogen generator method is most appealing as it is a seemingly free energy already existing in nature. A nitrogen generator with a 5000 (Nm3/h) capacity has the potential to be used to analyze gas composition and the results are compared with the gas composition of a conventional steam turbine, which is used to pressurize 6000 (kWh) injection steam turbines. The magnetic bearing must be installed in both systems to modify all centrifuged systems which reduces all energy consumption in all systems by more than 50%. Artificial intelligence is used with the machine to analyze and control nitrogen gas flow to provide a more precise evaluation resulting in a more efficient technology. It should further be noted that the nitrogen turbine is superior to the steam turbine because it does not require the burning of fossil fuel to generate power. Hence, it is crucial to modify conventional technologies to improve energy sustainability and begin the long task of tackling environmental issues.

Advanced Electric Battery Power Storage for Motors through the Use of Differential Gears and High Torque for Recirculating Power Generation

“…However, to be competitive with a group of advanced power generation technologies [76,77] such as solar, wind, hydro, and nuclear power, and newly discovered sustainable clean energy technologies such as nitrogen power, the key issue is the cost to the consumer. When comparing estimates in terms of operating costs per unit of electricity kw/h/USD and comparing the costs for building a power plant per unit of Mwe/USD [1,78], it was found that solar power had the highest operating costs, including expenses such as maintenance of technology materials, and labor costs of approximately 0.181 kw/h/USD and an estimated 600,000 Mwe/USD in investment cost for power plant construction. [7].…”

“…Nuclear power had the cheapest operating costs at 0.030 kw/h/USD but the most expensive cost for power plant construction at roughly 5,000,000 Mwe/USD. Finally, nitrogen power had overhead operating costs of 0.045 kw/h/USD and projected investment expenses for power plant construction of 2,000,000Mwe/USD [1], as shown in Table 7. A comparative analysis of the cost of power plant technology found that energy storage and renewable electric motor power have operating costs, including expenses such as the maintenance of equipment and labor of 0.030 kw/h/USD and an estimated cost of investing in the construction of a power plant at 1,500,000 Mwe/USD.…”

“…This is especially true when this new technological innovation is applied to the electromagnetic power system or magnetic bearing to the machine shaft to reduce friction in the rotation system [13,[80][81][82][83][84][85]. It also reduced energy consumption in the system by almost 50% [1] and led to electrical energy in the system. Motor power is a green technology with significant potential to be a major player in the field of sustainable energy in the future.…”

“…This has come with considerable blowback from both the fossil fuel industry and government interests due to such drawbacks as price and difficulty in implementation. The primary forms of clean energy these days are pressurized energy from nitrogen gas [1], geothermal energy, hydropower, solar energy, tidal energy, etc., which all aim to replace the conventional energy uses that harms the environment [2][3][4].…”