Advanced Techniques in Diagnostic Microbiology 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-33900-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 212 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the adoption of the evidence-based reflex criteria was associated with a reduction in the number of unnecessary cultures, significantly decreasing the number of patients inappropriately treated with antibiotics. The decrease in number of urine cultures associated with the new evidence-based criteria supports the arguments demonstrated in other studies regarding the potential positive effects of adopting quality laboratory procedures on reducing unnecessary antibiotic use (Stratton, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the adoption of the evidence-based reflex criteria was associated with a reduction in the number of unnecessary cultures, significantly decreasing the number of patients inappropriately treated with antibiotics. The decrease in number of urine cultures associated with the new evidence-based criteria supports the arguments demonstrated in other studies regarding the potential positive effects of adopting quality laboratory procedures on reducing unnecessary antibiotic use (Stratton, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Most importantly, the high PPVs associated with the newly implemented criteria have enhanced the quality of laboratory reports, reducing the misuse of antibiotics due to suboptimal results, and will subsequently slow the emergence of resistance (Schmiemann et al, 2010;Stratton, 2018). The enhanced quality of laboratory procedures is important for diagnosing patients accurately and directing providers to the appropriate antibiotic treatment and improving overall patient outcomes (Flores-Mireles et al, 2015;Schmiemann et al, 2010;Tanday, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…119 The number of ctDNA differs depending on tumor type, location, and tumor cascade and is released from both primary and metastatic tumor regions. 48 Its analysis can provide valuable insight into tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution, 120 as well as enable identification of tumor-specific genetic mutations. 48,121 With this, ctDNA can be used as a tool for cancer diagnosis, monitoring signs of disease recurrence and help guide treatment in patients with advanced cancers.…”
Section: Circulating Tumor Dna (Ctdna)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the protocols of the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and those of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) for the evaluation of medicines and pure compounds have been implemented in the first way (Leonard et al 2018;O'Halloran et al 2018;Rancoita et al 2018); both CLSI and EUCAST contemplate evaluation for bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi using methods ranging from broth dilution to disk diffusion, and only CLSI contemplates a protocol for the evaluation of antiviral activity (Balouiri et al 2016). Unfortunately, these methods have problems for the evaluation of new molecules and formulations due to their low automation in the case of broth dilution, such as the low diffusion of nonpolar compounds in the agar as in the case of disk diffusion, which affects the evaluation of antimicrobial activity (Egorova et al 2017;Stratton 2018;Eloff 2019). It has also tried to automate these techniques using fluorescent dyes that determine cell viability such as resazurin, SYTO9, and 4′,6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) but that tend to react with metal nanoparticles, which alters the results of in vitro susceptibility (Panic et al 2015;Magana et al 2018).…”
Section: Antimicrobial Models For Nanomaterials Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%