Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202201351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Nanostructured Conjugated Microporous Polymer Application in a Tandem Photoelectrochemical Cell for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

Abstract: Solar energy conversion through photoelectrochemical cells by organic semiconductors is a hot topic that continues to grow due to the promising optoelectronic properties of this class of materials. In this sense, conjugated polymers have raised the interest of researchers due to their interesting light‐harvesting properties. Besides, their extended π‐conjugation provides them with an excellent charge conduction along the whole structure. In particular, conjugated porous polymers (CPPs) exhibit an inherent poro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, the R s (Figure b) shows a flat behavior with the applied potential for both samples, showing values between 25 and 60 Ω cm 2 range. On the other hand, the charge-transfer resistances of both samples (Figure c) decrease under illumination, as expected for a photoelectrode. Additionally, under dark and illumination conditions, the Mo-doped sample shows lower values of R ct along the whole potential window, in good agreement with its higher photocurrent. Furthermore, both samples show a clear decrease in the capacitance with the applied potential (Figure d), as a consequence of an enhanced extraction of the photogenerated holes from the semiconducting absorber to the electrolyte, as expected for an n-type semiconductor. , Mo-doped TiO 2 shows higher capacitance values along the whole potential window, which can be related to a higher density of photogenerated holes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…On the one hand, the R s (Figure b) shows a flat behavior with the applied potential for both samples, showing values between 25 and 60 Ω cm 2 range. On the other hand, the charge-transfer resistances of both samples (Figure c) decrease under illumination, as expected for a photoelectrode. Additionally, under dark and illumination conditions, the Mo-doped sample shows lower values of R ct along the whole potential window, in good agreement with its higher photocurrent. Furthermore, both samples show a clear decrease in the capacitance with the applied potential (Figure d), as a consequence of an enhanced extraction of the photogenerated holes from the semiconducting absorber to the electrolyte, as expected for an n-type semiconductor. , Mo-doped TiO 2 shows higher capacitance values along the whole potential window, which can be related to a higher density of photogenerated holes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Photovoltage measurements confirm the photoactive properties of IEC-1, exhibiting the characteristic behavior of a p-type semiconductor and showing an increase in the signal under illumination (Figure S16A). 47 The photoresponse of the electrode when illuminating in open circuit potential is 130 mV. Besides, the linear sweep voltammetry measurements under chopped illumination (Figure S16B) confirm the photoactivity of this material and its potential to be used as a photocathode due to the presence of negative photocurrents along the whole potential window.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Under illumination, the CuBi 2 O 4 samples show an increase in the OCP values, associated with the positive splitting of the pseudo‐Fermi levels, characteristic of a p‐type semiconductor, confirming the photoactive and semiconducting nature of this material and its possible use as a photocathode. [ 29 ] Specifically, the samples presented herein show a photovoltage of 0.35±$\pm$0.05 V. Figure 3B shows the J–V under front (blue trace) and back (brown trace) chopped illumination at the CuBi 2 O 4 photocathode. As shown in this figure, the sample shows around twice photocurrent densities under back illumination, due to a slow hole transport in the film.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%