2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced MRI techniques to improve our understanding of experience-induced neuroplasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
108
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 283 publications
1
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, dMRI methods by themselves cannot distinguish amongst these possibilities (Jones and Cercignani 2010; De Santis et al 2014). Understanding the neurobiological properties contributing to these group differences will benefit from the combination of diffusion measures with other quantitative MRI methods for estimating myelin content or axonal diameter more directly (Assaf et al 2008; Mezer et al 2013; Tardif et al 2015; Travis, Golden, et al 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, dMRI methods by themselves cannot distinguish amongst these possibilities (Jones and Cercignani 2010; De Santis et al 2014). Understanding the neurobiological properties contributing to these group differences will benefit from the combination of diffusion measures with other quantitative MRI methods for estimating myelin content or axonal diameter more directly (Assaf et al 2008; Mezer et al 2013; Tardif et al 2015; Travis, Golden, et al 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work has reported that the T1 signal is also sensitive to macromolecules (e.g., the proteins and lipids forming cellular membranes), water content of brain tissues, and to a lesser extent iron, and the T2 signal is sensitive to iron and deoxyhemoglobin content, in addition to myelin (Tardif et al, 2016). Most notably, myelin and inflammation both alter the signal intensity of T1w and T2w images in opposite directions, both contributing to an increase in T1w/T2w ratio values.…”
Section: Methodological Considerations and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim is to allow greater inference about local tissue composition, for example the very short T 2 associated with myelin compared to other water within a voxel 43 .…”
Section: Microstructure -Mri At the Microscopic Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main downside of quantitative T 1 and T 2 mapping is the significantly greater amount of time required for equivalent SNR and resolution, as the gold-standard methods require acquiring data at multiple echos or inversion times 43,44 . This is compounded by the general need to estimate multiple T 2 values within each voxel if one wants to map specific compartments like myelin.…”
Section: Microstructure -Mri At the Microscopic Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%