2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11041938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Modelling and Risk Analysis of RC Buildings with Sliding Isolation Systems Designed by the Italian Seismic Code

Abstract: Double Curved Concave Surface Sliders (DCCSS) are seismic isolators based on the pendulum principle widely used worldwide. Coherently with European code, DCCSS do not include any mechanical elements as end-stopper. In case of displacement higher than those associated with the design earthquakes, the inner slider runs on the edge of the sliding surfaces beyond their geometric displacement capacity keeping the ability to support gravity loads. In this paper, the advanced modelling and risk analysis of reinforced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the overall system is supposed to be subjected to a sever seismic input, and consequently the design displacement of the isolation system is expected to be overcome, the extra-stroke behavior needs to be numerically modeled. Recent research works ( [6], [8]) have shown good agreement between some experimental outcomes pseudo-dynamic tests in extra-stroke range for DCSS devices and possible numerical modeling strategies, namely:…”
Section: Numerical Substructure and Dynamic Systemmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Since the overall system is supposed to be subjected to a sever seismic input, and consequently the design displacement of the isolation system is expected to be overcome, the extra-stroke behavior needs to be numerically modeled. Recent research works ( [6], [8]) have shown good agreement between some experimental outcomes pseudo-dynamic tests in extra-stroke range for DCSS devices and possible numerical modeling strategies, namely:…”
Section: Numerical Substructure and Dynamic Systemmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…An isolation system composed of DCCSS bearings was designed for the collapse limit state (CLS), following the Italian seismic code (NTC 2018). The equivalent parameters are summarized in Table 2, where T eq is the equivalent period of the isolated building, ξ eq is the equivalent damping, and d bd is the design displacement (Ponzo et al, 2021). Once the isolation system was designed, the geometrical and mechanical parameters of the isolator shown in Figure 9 were used in the proposed algebraic solution to define displacements d p and d ot , limit displacement d lim , and the shear force limit F lim .…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To describe the over-stroke behaviour of the DCCSS bearing, the SingleFPBearing element (Mckenna et al, 2000), providing a fixed bottom node (i-node) and a top node (j-node), was modified by adding three zero-length parallel hinges between the j-node and an external fixed node (k-node in Figure 9), as already discussed in other studies (Di Cesare et al, 2019Ponzo et al, 2020;Ponzo et al, 2021;Cardone et al, 2022). In Figure 9 the resulting sloping dog bone shape for the constitutive law is shown with the main characterizing parameters, such as capacity displacement d c and force F c .…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Detailed experimental analysis of structures, including the characterization of dynamic properties, has become vital to the refinement of the finite-element model, which is used to carry out vulnerability analyses of structures [13]. The numerical model is also helpful for performing vulnerability risk assessments by comparing the same structural systems under two or more different sets of seismic site conditions [14]. All these numerical models are reliable tools for studying the vulnerability and fragility of structures provided that the models are validated using proper experimental test results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%