2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2010.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced microscopy techniques for quantitative analysis in neuromorphology and neuropathology research: current status and requirements for the future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Projections and minor corrections in intensity and contrast were made with the Imaris software program (Bitplane AG, Zurich, Switzerland). The whole system and controlling software have been described in more detail previously [24, 43]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Projections and minor corrections in intensity and contrast were made with the Imaris software program (Bitplane AG, Zurich, Switzerland). The whole system and controlling software have been described in more detail previously [24, 43]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When utilizing these reagents for immunostaining of the human tissue, it is important to take into account antigenicity, which can be affected by the delayed fixation of the postmortem tissue (Boekhoorn et al, 2006; Liu et al, 2008) and the specificity of the antibodies, which may be related to a particular species (for example, antibodies which work for rodent tissue may not work for human tissue). Ideally, quantification of cells expressing the biomarker of interest should be obtained using unbiased stereology, such as the optical dissector method (Lemmens et al, 2010), although in human samples this goal can be difficult to achieve due to the low number of proliferating cells (Liu et al, 2008). …”
Section: Methods To Assess Neurogenesis In Humansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, manual analysis of spines is prohibitively time consuming and widely subject to operator variability. Recent software packages now can analyze dendrite and spine morphology automatically (for review see Lemmens et al, 2010; Meijering, 2010), greatly reducing manual interventions to initial setup and postanalysis editing. In particular, we utilized NeuronStudio (Rodriguez et al, 2003, 2006, 2008, 2009; Dumitriu et al, 2011) for all automated morphology reconstructions included in this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%