2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced lattice support structures for metal additive manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
147
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 368 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
147
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the studies typically discussed in literature searches discuss rule-of-thumb ways to physically prevent the stresses from destroying the parts during printing and are little concerned with trying to understand the mechanics of the stresses and how they directly affect the overhanging features. There was considerable discussion of this problem in the studies by Hussein et al [21,22], Matsumoto et al [18], Calingnano [23], Mohanty and Hattel [24], Zeng [25], Li et al [26] and Gan and Wong [27], but these addressed application-specific issues and did not discuss the problem at the level of feature and part design. Some of the opinions commonly heard from practitioners are that the overhanging features are most severely affected by the stresses because they are not physically welded to the build plate during the printing and are thinner and less resistant to thermal shock.…”
Section: The Slm/dmls Residual Stresses Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the studies typically discussed in literature searches discuss rule-of-thumb ways to physically prevent the stresses from destroying the parts during printing and are little concerned with trying to understand the mechanics of the stresses and how they directly affect the overhanging features. There was considerable discussion of this problem in the studies by Hussein et al [21,22], Matsumoto et al [18], Calingnano [23], Mohanty and Hattel [24], Zeng [25], Li et al [26] and Gan and Wong [27], but these addressed application-specific issues and did not discuss the problem at the level of feature and part design. Some of the opinions commonly heard from practitioners are that the overhanging features are most severely affected by the stresses because they are not physically welded to the build plate during the printing and are thinner and less resistant to thermal shock.…”
Section: The Slm/dmls Residual Stresses Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies that discuss the pros and cons of support structures to prevent damage in SLM/DMLS well were those performed by Hussein et al [21,22], Jhabvala et al [28], Matsumoto et al [18], Thomas and Bibb [29,30], Wang et al [31], Kruth et al [32] and Papadakis et al [33]. Data from several studies by Hussein et al [22], Kruth et al [32], Vora et al [34] and Patterson et al [35,36] suggested that the use of rigid support structures during SLM/DMLS for overhanging features may actually cause the residual stresses to be worse than if the overhang had no solid support during printing.…”
Section: The Slm/dmls Residual Stresses Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies typically discussed in literature searches discuss rule-of-thumb ways to physically prevent the stresses from destroying the parts during printing and are little concerned with trying to understand the mechanics of the stresses and how they directly affect the overhanging features. There was considerable discussion of this problem in the studies by Hussein et al [21][22] Some of the opinions commonly heard from practitioners are that the overhanging features are most severely affected by the stresses because they are not physically welded to the build plate during the printing and are thinner and less resistant to thermal shock. Depending on the specific geometry, stress concentrations between the features and the main parts also likely play a role in magnifying the effect.…”
Section: Figure 1 Slm/dmls Process Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies that well discuss the pros and cons of support structures to prevent damage in SLM/DMLS were those performed by Hussein et al [21][22] [34] and Patterson et al [35][36] suggested that the use of rigid support structures during SLM/DMLS for overhanging features may actually cause the residual stresses to be worse than if the overhang had no solid support during printing.…”
Section: Figure 1 Slm/dmls Process Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation