SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2011 2011
DOI: 10.1190/1.3627932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced geohazards assessment in shallow water through the estimation of primaries by sparse inversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(), Toxopeus et al . (), and Buckley and Cottee (in press); however, Games () considered that, for very shallow targets, exploration 3D data may be unusable for AVO purposes. Extended AVO methods such as fluid‐factor, stack projection, EI, and EEI, for the purposes of MEG data interpretation, remain comparatively unreported.…”
Section: Petrophysical Methodologies and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(), Toxopeus et al . (), and Buckley and Cottee (in press); however, Games () considered that, for very shallow targets, exploration 3D data may be unusable for AVO purposes. Extended AVO methods such as fluid‐factor, stack projection, EI, and EEI, for the purposes of MEG data interpretation, remain comparatively unreported.…”
Section: Petrophysical Methodologies and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AVO methods of interpreting for shallow gas in top-hole drilling hazard studies are discussed in Townsend and Armstrong (1990), Lee et al (2010), Toxopeus et al (2011), and Buckley and Cottee (in press); however, Games (2012) value of 0.567 (Simm and Bacon 2014), a time-analysis-intervalto-wavelet-length ratio of 6.4, and an NMSE of 0.029. The estimated wavelet has a phase shift of 26° from the 3D seismic with a time shift of -4 ms.…”
Section: Case Study No 1-synthetic Well-tie North Seamentioning
confidence: 99%