2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07364-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Endoscopic Resection Techniques in Cirrhosis—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, ESD in patients with liver cirrhosis is challenging due to the presence of GOV, ascites, coagulation disorders and/or thrombocytopenia. A systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that pooled rates of immediate & delayed bleeding, perforation, and death during EMR and/or ESD in patients with cirrhosis were 9.5% (CI 4.0-21.1), 6.6% (CI 4.2-10.3), 2.1% (CI 1.1-3.9) and 0.6% (CI 0.2-1.7), with only immediate bleeding rate higher than that in general population [22]. A multicenter observational study enrolled 134 early esophageal tumor lesions in 112 patients with liver cirrhosis reported 3(2.7%) perforations, 8 (7.1%) delayed bleedings, 8 (7.1%) sepsis, 6 (5.4%) cirrhosis decompensations within 30 days and 22 (19.6%) esophageal strictures [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, ESD in patients with liver cirrhosis is challenging due to the presence of GOV, ascites, coagulation disorders and/or thrombocytopenia. A systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that pooled rates of immediate & delayed bleeding, perforation, and death during EMR and/or ESD in patients with cirrhosis were 9.5% (CI 4.0-21.1), 6.6% (CI 4.2-10.3), 2.1% (CI 1.1-3.9) and 0.6% (CI 0.2-1.7), with only immediate bleeding rate higher than that in general population [22]. A multicenter observational study enrolled 134 early esophageal tumor lesions in 112 patients with liver cirrhosis reported 3(2.7%) perforations, 8 (7.1%) delayed bleedings, 8 (7.1%) sepsis, 6 (5.4%) cirrhosis decompensations within 30 days and 22 (19.6%) esophageal strictures [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Other small studies have evaluated primarily gastric and esophageal ESD in cirrhotic and have found similar findings, with no significant difference in bleeding[ 12 , 21 , 22 ]. One meta-analysis that included 319 patients who underwent ESD evaluated outcomes among patients with cirrhosis who underwent both EMR or ESD and reported pooled data[ 23 ]. Delayed (LP1) bleeding, perforation, and short-term mortality were equivalent, but rates of immediate bleeding between cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis patients were significantly different [13.3% vs 5.2%, relative risk 1.57 (95%CI: 1.2-2.1)].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ESD in patients with liver cirrhosis is challenging due to the presence of GOV, ascites, poor tolerance of anesthesia, coagulation disorders, and/or thrombocytopenia. A systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the pooled rates of immediate and delayed bleeding, perforation, and death during EMR and/or ESD in patients with cirrhosis were 9.5%, 6.6%, 2.1%, and 0.6%, with only an immediate bleeding rate higher than that of the general population [28]. A multicenter observational study that enrolled 134 early esophageal tumorous lesions in 112 patients with liver cirrhosis reported 3 (2.7%) perforations, 8 (7.1%) delayed bleedings, 8 (7.1%) instances of sepsis, 6 (5.4%) cirrhosis decompensations within 30 days, and 22 (19.6%) esophageal strictures [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%