Toward a Science of Distributed Learning. 2007
DOI: 10.1037/11582-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced distributed learning for team training in command and control applications.

Abstract: Today's technological advances in weaponry and communications systems, along with military drawbacks, leaner budgets, and the changing nature of modern warfare, combine to place serious demands on Department of Defense (DOD) training programs. One consequence of this interaction is a push within the DOD for distributed learning and training (DLT) systems. In this chapter, we discuss the unique training needs of the DOD and how DLT can be exploited to address the increased training demands. We also discuss the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation-based team training (Dorsey et al, 2009) would allow for the design of perturbations that focus on specific events, times, or interactions (Gorman, Cooke, & Duran, 2009). Simulation-based training can emphasize physical (equipment) fidelity or cognitive fidelity (how well the simulation exercises psychological processes required for that task; Goettle, Ashworth, & Chaiken, 2007). For perturbation training, cognitive fidelity should be emphasized in order to exercise the team interaction processes needed for the real-world task (Bowers & Jentsch, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation-based team training (Dorsey et al, 2009) would allow for the design of perturbations that focus on specific events, times, or interactions (Gorman, Cooke, & Duran, 2009). Simulation-based training can emphasize physical (equipment) fidelity or cognitive fidelity (how well the simulation exercises psychological processes required for that task; Goettle, Ashworth, & Chaiken, 2007). For perturbation training, cognitive fidelity should be emphasized in order to exercise the team interaction processes needed for the real-world task (Bowers & Jentsch, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of designers of training programs is to help trainees master efficient strategies, such as the use of scripts, even if they are difficult to learn. This can be achieved by cognitive fidelity in training modules (Goettl et al, in press), which implies that trainees go through a transition process from one or more simpler strategies to the more complex strategy. In reality however, there are cases in which cognitive fidelity cannot be ensured because of task complexity or difficulties in controlling the task environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is embedded in the literature that emphasizes cognitive fidelity (J. S. Brown, 1986) in training, or the attempt to induce transfer by developing simplified versions of tasks that promote transfer from simple to complex tasks (Goettl, Ashworth, & Chaiken, in press; Gopher, Weil, & Siegel, 1989; Hart & Battiste, 1992).…”
Section: The Role Of Cognitive Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…målet er fjerntransfer eller en naturtro fysisk gjengivelse av anvendelseskonteksten dersom målet er naertransfer (Goettl, Ashworth & Chaiken, 2007).…”
Section: Ulike Former For Transferunclassified