2016
DOI: 10.1111/cge.12798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced diagnostic genetic testing in inherited retinal disease: experience from a single tertiary referral centre in the UK National Health Service

Abstract: Background/Aims

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Targeted NGS analysis is a valuable method for molecular genetic diagnostics of IRDs as also supported by several previous studies 1618 . Our detection rate of 48% is relatively low compared to other studies; however, this may be biased as our study population was derived from clinical biobank samples that had been extensively investigated over the years in several research projects and diagnostics efforts, resulting in many solved cases not included in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Targeted NGS analysis is a valuable method for molecular genetic diagnostics of IRDs as also supported by several previous studies 1618 . Our detection rate of 48% is relatively low compared to other studies; however, this may be biased as our study population was derived from clinical biobank samples that had been extensively investigated over the years in several research projects and diagnostics efforts, resulting in many solved cases not included in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The molecular diagnosis was achieved in 58.62% of IRDs patients (17/29). This diagnostic yield is in line with previous works 30 that similarly analyzed population-specific IRDs genes, and it is somewhat higher than other studies involving more genes 31 , 32 . It demonstrates that a consistent and adapted design of the panel guarantees a good diagnostic yield while reducing sequencing costs, time and analytical effort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Only 32% of the patients were classified as genetically solved. Other studies of IRD report somewhat higher diagnostic yield, with detection rates from 39% to 76% (O'Sullivan et al 2012;Eisenberger et al 2013;Huang et al 2015;Ellingford et al 2016;Patel et al 2016;Tiwari et al 2016;Carss et al 2017;Khan et al 2017;Stone et al 2017). High-throughput sequencing (HTS) had a higher diagnostic yield Diagnosis uncertain 0% (n = 0/8) -AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; XL, X-linked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%