2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Carotid Plaque Imaging

Abstract: Treatment of carotid artery stenosis by endarterectomy or stenting can significantly reduce stroke risk. In clinical practice, indication for surgery or stenting is primarily based on the degree of stenosis, but there is growing awareness that pathophysiological features within a vulnerable plaque play a key role in predicting stroke risk. Important molecular processes associated with plaque vulnerability are inflammation, lipid accumulation, proteolysis, apoptosis, angiogenesis and thrombosis. The rapidly eme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many investigators have reported that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful tool to predict the components of carotid plaque, its validity is not established [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. On the other hand, 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) may be an alternative modality to directly identify the inflamed plaque in carotid artery stenosis [9,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Therefore, this study was aimed at evaluating the validity of dual imaging with MRI and FDG-PET to predict the vulnerable components of carotid plaques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many investigators have reported that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful tool to predict the components of carotid plaque, its validity is not established [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. On the other hand, 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) may be an alternative modality to directly identify the inflamed plaque in carotid artery stenosis [9,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Therefore, this study was aimed at evaluating the validity of dual imaging with MRI and FDG-PET to predict the vulnerable components of carotid plaques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They therefore cannot distinguish between stable and unstable plaques. Because plaque composition rather than stenosis is important in detecting an unstable plaque, new imaging modalities are needed (5). 18 F-FDG PET can be used to identify vulnerable plaques in atherosclerotic disease, because 18 F-FDG accumulates in activated macrophages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, a high amount of fibrous contents and greater calcification may be associated with a lower risk of stroke (stable plaques). Therefore, plaque morphology and composition should be included in the evaluation of atherosclerotic diseases, which will further contribute to the knowledge about lumen narrowing 3,13,16,17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the characteristics of carotid stenosis are described using imaging methods, such as duplex ultrasound (US), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), CT angiography (CT-angio) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). The content of the atheroma may be analyzed using several of these imaging techniques, but most authors use them only to define the characteristics of anatomic plaque stenosis, while plaque morphology and composition are often not investigated 3,5 . Other complementary imaging tests, such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission CT (SPECT), may play an adjuvant role in follow-up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation