2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced analysis of developmental and ripening characteristics of pollinated common-type fig ( Ficus carica L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
21
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite a previous study by Rosianski et al (2016) showing no difference in ethylene production between parthenocarpic and pollinated fig fruit, two transcripts among the 14 ethylene-biosynthesis-related genes, SAM synthase and SAM2 transcripts ( Figures 6A,B, Supplementary Figure S6 ) showed higher expression levels in pollinated vs. parthenocarpic inflorescences during the ripening process, while SAM3 had higher levels in parthenocarpic and pollinated fruit at 8–9WAP and 10–100% ripening stages, respectively ( Figures 6C,D ). ACS2 and 4 showed extremely low expression levels in both pulp and inflorescence tissues at 8–9WAP and high levels at the 10–100% ripening stages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite a previous study by Rosianski et al (2016) showing no difference in ethylene production between parthenocarpic and pollinated fig fruit, two transcripts among the 14 ethylene-biosynthesis-related genes, SAM synthase and SAM2 transcripts ( Figures 6A,B, Supplementary Figure S6 ) showed higher expression levels in pollinated vs. parthenocarpic inflorescences during the ripening process, while SAM3 had higher levels in parthenocarpic and pollinated fruit at 8–9WAP and 10–100% ripening stages, respectively ( Figures 6C,D ). ACS2 and 4 showed extremely low expression levels in both pulp and inflorescence tissues at 8–9WAP and high levels at the 10–100% ripening stages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Recently, a comparative physiological and morphological analysis of pollination effects on the ‘common fig’-type ‘Brown Turkey’ fruit development and ripening characteristics was performed (Rosianski et al, 2016). In general, pollinated fruit showed altered developmental processes compared to parthenocarpic fruit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pollination slows the ripening process, resulting in larger fruits that consequently become more susceptible to cracking. The pollinated fruit has a greener skin and a darker internal pulp color than the non-pollinated fruit (Oukabli et al 2001;Michailides et al 2008;Rosianski et al 2016). The fruit of the common fig develops laterally in the leaf axils on shoots from the concurrent season (Crane 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During phase I, the fruit changes its size mostly due to rapid cell division, followed by phase II, in which changes in fruit size, color and firmness are arrested. Phase III lasts 2-3 days and is characterized by rapid fruit growth, softening and changes in color, texture, sugar capacity and aroma (Chessa 1997;Freiman et al 2014;Rosianski et al 2016). The fig-ripening process is classified as climacteric, with respiration rate and ethylene production accelerating at the onset of the ripening phase (Marei and Crane 1971).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%