Advance care planning belangrijk bij COPD

Bruntink, Rob

doi:10.1007/s12479-014-0077-4

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We strongly argue that, given the interview data presented here, cultural interventions in general, and Death Café in particular, do have the power to raise new questions and not just answer the pre-determined questions of policy-makers. This grassroots movement has its own dynamics and momentum, which is no more controlled by the centre and its own founder, Jon Underwood, than it is by health and social care professionals or policymakers who try to use it as a tool to facilitate planning (Bruntink, 2019). Death Café represents a cultural intervention which certainly has the potential to contribute to policy-makers’ neoliberal agenda to increase individual responsibility for death and dying (Borgstrom and Walter, 2015).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Global Spread of Death Café: A Cultural Intervention Relevant to Policy?

Richards

Koksvik

Gerson

et al. 2020

Social Policy and Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New demographic and epidemiological trends mean people are dying at older ages and over long periods of time, from multiple, chronic illnesses. There is a perception that these growing and changing needs will require novel community responses. One starting point is having ‘conversations’ about dying and death, and in this the phenomenon of ‘Death Café’ merits attention. In the first study of its kind, we report on interviews with forty-nine Death Café organisers in thirty-four countries, exploring how this ‘cultural intervention’, first developed in the UK, has transferred elsewhere. Using thematic analysis, we identify competing tensions between: local translation of Death Café and a desire for international alignment alongside instrumental use of the Death Café form and its incidental effects. The passion and commitment of Death Café organisers is compelling but may not lead to the behavioural change required to support a new public face of dying.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%