2015
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advance and stagnation in the treatment of patients with lymphoma and myeloma: Analysis using population‐based cancer registry data in Japan from 1993 to 2006

Abstract: There have been significant advances in the treatment of patients with lymphoma and myeloma. Although the improvements in survival outcome have been clearly addressed by clinical trials, these studies includes patients who are otherwise healthy and would be eligible for trials that the actual improvement in survival in the general patient population over time is yet to be elucidated. Therefore, we reviewed the cancer-registry data of patients with lymphoma and myeloma in Japan from 1993 to 2006 and estimated r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…CHOP is the standard therapy for PTCL ( 51) although new drugs (pralatrexate and romidepsin) received approval in 2009 ( 52, 53). Survival is generally described as poor, although our cancer-specific survival estimate of approximately 65% for PTCL was higher than previously suggested ( 54, 55). We find that 5-year cancer-specific survival for the PTCL cases not otherwise specified was 40%, similar to what is reported in the literature (54, 55).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CHOP is the standard therapy for PTCL ( 51) although new drugs (pralatrexate and romidepsin) received approval in 2009 ( 52, 53). Survival is generally described as poor, although our cancer-specific survival estimate of approximately 65% for PTCL was higher than previously suggested ( 54, 55). We find that 5-year cancer-specific survival for the PTCL cases not otherwise specified was 40%, similar to what is reported in the literature (54, 55).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Survival is generally described as poor, although our cancer-specific survival estimate of approximately 65% for PTCL was higher than previously suggested ( 54, 55). We find that 5-year cancer-specific survival for the PTCL cases not otherwise specified was 40%, similar to what is reported in the literature (54, 55). Our PTCL classification does include Alk+ T-cell lymphoma, and this also has a low survival rate (5-year survival 52%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Stratified Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed worse survival with increasing age, male gender, and use of chemotherapy without R. Such trends were also observed in an US SEER registry study [23]. Association of R-based regimens with higher survival rates has been suggested in earlier reports [4,8,9]. Our results further demonstrate that the survival rate was highest with R-CHOP, followed by R-CVP, R + other chemotherapy and chemotherapy without R, which were also supported by TTNT outcomes, reflecting the treatment modality of patients in another real-world setting study [24].…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Five‐year relative survival in the last period 2003‐2006 was only 27.8% which is considerably lower than that reported from the USA and Europe; however, survival rates were reported to be combined for all age groups, and there was no age‐stratified information on relative survival for younger and older patients. In Japan, thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide were not approved during the period under study …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five‐year overall survival increased from 31.2 to 50.3 months in a study from 18 affiliated hospitals in Japan comparing two calendar periods 1990‐2000 and 2001‐2012 which should be compared with a 5‐year relative survival of 27.8% in a registry‐based study from Japan 2003‐2006 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%