Hydraulic Measurements and Experimental Methods 2002 2002
DOI: 10.1061/40655(2002)101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ADV Data Analysis for Turbulent Flows: Low Correlation Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
27
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At high levels of turbulence particles in the water will not maintain their relative positions with respect to each other, which increases the Doppler noise level of the return signal. As reported by Martin et al 2002, increasing the velocity range will increase the correlation values. However, such an approach will decrease the measurement accuracy and should be applied with caution.…”
Section: Percentage Of Outliersmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At high levels of turbulence particles in the water will not maintain their relative positions with respect to each other, which increases the Doppler noise level of the return signal. As reported by Martin et al 2002, increasing the velocity range will increase the correlation values. However, such an approach will decrease the measurement accuracy and should be applied with caution.…”
Section: Percentage Of Outliersmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Cutoff values of 50%, 60% and 70% correspond to ~2%, ~4% and ~10% filtered data. The velocity measurements become less well correlated near the bed due to increased turbulence levels near boundaries (Martin et al 2002). At high levels of turbulence particles in the water will not maintain their relative positions with respect to each other, which increases the Doppler noise level of the return signal.…”
Section: Percentage Of Outliersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the PST filters detect a higher number of outliers in the near bed region for the X velocity components, for both cases (Figures 3.8,A1 and A2), which could be due to increased turbulence levels near boundary (Martin et al 2002) and/or beam spreading. The mPST filters also detect a higher number of outliers in the near bed region, but it is much less than the PST method.…”
Section: Percentage Of Outliersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low correlated data often have similar velocity and turbulence statistics to the high correlated data; and, based on this definition, can be considered as valid (see also Martin et al 2002;Rusello 2009;Gunawan et al 2011).…”
Section: Percentage Of Outliersmentioning
confidence: 99%