The aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to provide an MRI-based examination framework of venous malformations (VMs) infiltrating the sciatic nerve and determine the frequency of nerve infiltration patterns and muscle involvement in correlation to the patients' quality of life. Pelvic and lower limb MR images of 378 patients with vascular malformations were examined retrospectively. Pain levels and restriction of motion were evaluated with a questionnaire. Crosssectional areas of affected nerves were compared at standardized anatomical landmarks. Intraneural infiltration patterns and involvement of muscles surrounding the sciatic nerve were documented. Sciatic nerve infiltration occurred in 23/299 patients (7.7%) with VM. In all cases (23/23; 100%), gluteal or hamstring muscles surrounding the nerve were affected by the VM. Infiltrated nerves were enlarged and showed signal alterations (T2-hyperintensity) compared to the unaffected side. Enlarged nerve cross-sectional areas were associated with elevated pain levels. Three nerve infiltration patterns were observed: subepineurial (12/23; 52.2%), subparaneurial (6/23; 26.1%) and combined (5/23; 21.7%) infiltration. This study provides a clinically relevant assessment for sciatic nerve infiltration patterns and muscle involvement of VMs, while suggesting that VMs in gluteal and hamstring muscles require closer investigation of the sciatic nerve by the radiologist. Abbreviations VM Venous malformation ISSVA International society for the study of vascular anomalies VMCM Cutaneomucosal venous malformation CLVM Capillary-lymphatic-venous malformation STIR Short tau inversion recovery TSE Turbo spin echo TWIST Time-resolved angiography with interleaved stochastic trajectories Vascular anomalies of the lower limb are an uncommon diagnosis, which begins with an early onset in childhood or adolescence. These anomalies are congenital, grow at the same rate as the child and do not regress over time 1. The diagnosis is primarily made based upon physical examination and the patient's history of malformations with subcutaneous parts. However, imaging with ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in confirming the diagnosis, as well as evaluating the size and extent of the malformation, because physical examinations tend to underestimate these factors 2. Deeply seated malformations without subcutaneous portions may only be detectable in MR images.