2020
DOI: 10.1002/acr.24216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adult Measures of General Health and Health‐Related Quality of Life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 270 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For context, the minimal clinically important difference for pain following interventions for people with OA is an absolute change of 2.0 units on a numeric rating scale [44], which suggests that therapeutic alliance may not have a clinically significant impact on pain. In quality of life, a 1-SD increase in physical therapist-rated therapeutic alliance score in our study corresponds to a 0.055-unit improvement in quality of life, approximating the estimated minimal clinically important difference of 0.06 on the AQoL [45]. Minimal clinically important differences for other outcome measures that we found were associated with therapeutic alliance (including self-efficacy and fear of movement) are unknown [46], and as such, the clinical significance of associations with these outcomes is unclear.…”
Section: Comparison With Earlier Worksupporting
confidence: 57%
“…For context, the minimal clinically important difference for pain following interventions for people with OA is an absolute change of 2.0 units on a numeric rating scale [44], which suggests that therapeutic alliance may not have a clinically significant impact on pain. In quality of life, a 1-SD increase in physical therapist-rated therapeutic alliance score in our study corresponds to a 0.055-unit improvement in quality of life, approximating the estimated minimal clinically important difference of 0.06 on the AQoL [45]. Minimal clinically important differences for other outcome measures that we found were associated with therapeutic alliance (including self-efficacy and fear of movement) are unknown [46], and as such, the clinical significance of associations with these outcomes is unclear.…”
Section: Comparison With Earlier Worksupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Most widely used generic patient reported outcome, and is valid and reliable. (43) The EQ-5D-5L index was calculated using an an England-based value set (43) as it closely resembled the Australian population (44).…”
Section: Participant Recruitment and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para a população cardiopata, a QV foi avaliada através dos instrumentos MLHFQ, composto de 27 itens e com um escore de 0 a 105 pontos, e MacNew, constituído de 21 itens e com um escore máximo de 7 para todos os domínios 18 . Para os sujeitos sem evento cardíaco prévio, foram utilizados os questionários SF-36, composto de 36 itens e com um escore de 0 a 100 pontos para todos os domínios e o PSN, formado por 38 itens e com um escore de 0 a 38 pontos 19 . Todos os instrumentos foram aplicados pela mesma entrevistadora, a fim de atenuar possíveis diferenças de compreensão devido a níveis educacionais distintos entre os participantes.…”
Section: Avaliação Da Qualidade De Vidaunclassified