2010
DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v5i1.1041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adult Learner's Motivation for the Use of Micro-blogging during Online Training Courses

Abstract: In this article we discuss our key idea that informal exchange in twitter contributes to the motivation of participants in online courses. Micro-blogging (via twitter) was introduced to groups of educators that participated in three online courses on the use of Web2.0 technologies and Online Didactics in educational settings. We used qualitative as well as quantitative methods to investigate their use of twitter and found out that informal exchange in twitter contributed to the motivation of learners during th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An examination of the literature suggested that there is not a universal content analysis framework, and researchers have developed different coding schemes based on their purposes of study. Some focused on the functions of tweets (Ebner et al, 2010;Lomicka & Lord, 2012), and some coded the tweets based on the types of user intention (Pauschenwein & Sfiri, 2010;Ross, Terras, Warwick & Welsh, 2011). As the previously developed coding schemes could not fully capture the interaction patterns manifested in the data, open coded analysis approach (Corbin & Microblogging-based professional development community 5 Strauss, 2008) was adopted, a methodology that mainly relies on grounded theory (Charmaz, 2006;Glaser & Strauss, 1967).…”
Section: Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An examination of the literature suggested that there is not a universal content analysis framework, and researchers have developed different coding schemes based on their purposes of study. Some focused on the functions of tweets (Ebner et al, 2010;Lomicka & Lord, 2012), and some coded the tweets based on the types of user intention (Pauschenwein & Sfiri, 2010;Ross, Terras, Warwick & Welsh, 2011). As the previously developed coding schemes could not fully capture the interaction patterns manifested in the data, open coded analysis approach (Corbin & Microblogging-based professional development community 5 Strauss, 2008) was adopted, a methodology that mainly relies on grounded theory (Charmaz, 2006;Glaser & Strauss, 1967).…”
Section: Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools are easy to access, use, and help people connect. Considering the purpose and use of Web 2.0 tools (i.e., participation, creation, & sharing), they are ideal mediators to help achieve social presence (Dunlap & Lowenthal, 2009) and social learning (Gunawardena, Hermans, Sanchez, Richmond, Bohley, & Tuttle, 2009), increase motivation (Pauschenwein & Sfiri, 2010), and create relatedness and sense of community (Wright, 2010). The incorporation of the Web2.0 social tools coupled with a pedagogy that capitalizes the capability of the tools is believed to benefit students in fully online courses the most because they can engage students with peers, instructors and community in creating and sharing ideas (McLoughlin & Lee, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these applications, social engagement critical to learning is extended beyond the cultural perspectives of a local community to groups that are diverse and geographically dispersed, such as groups of learners in online learning environments. Social learning enhanced by Web 2.0 applications is likely to increase motivation (Pauschenwein & Sfiri, 2010) and create relatedness and a sense of community (Wright, 2010) among learners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%