2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-018-09174-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adult CSF total protein upper reference limits should be age-partitioned and significantly higher than 0.45 g/L: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have shown that the widely used cutoff of 0.45 g/L is erroneously low [34,35]. Implementation of CSF values of 0.50 g/L for patients aged B 50 years and 0.60 g/L for those aged [ 50 years have been proposed as a better standard CSF reference value [36]. Adoption of these higher age-dependent reference values in a population of CIDP patients was shown to improve CIDP diagnostic specificity, without a meaningful compromise in diagnostic sensitivity [37].…”
Section: Laboratory Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that the widely used cutoff of 0.45 g/L is erroneously low [34,35]. Implementation of CSF values of 0.50 g/L for patients aged B 50 years and 0.60 g/L for those aged [ 50 years have been proposed as a better standard CSF reference value [36]. Adoption of these higher age-dependent reference values in a population of CIDP patients was shown to improve CIDP diagnostic specificity, without a meaningful compromise in diagnostic sensitivity [37].…”
Section: Laboratory Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adoption of 45 mg/dl as the URL was based on the publication in 1938 of a study that sampled a reference population of younger patients. Moreover, recent laboratory studies and a systematic review of the literature support implementation of CSF URL values of 50 mg/dl for patients aged ≤50 years and 60 mg/dl for those aged >50 years . Because CIDP misdiagnosis is frequent, CSF protein elevation contributes to CIDP (mis)diagnosis, and the CSF protein URL is undefined in CIDP, we sought to determine how different CSF‐TP URLs impact diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in patients in whom CIDP is correctly and incorrectly diagnosed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Отмечено, что наибольший процент пациентов с ошибочно установленным диагнозом ХВДП имели небольшое отклонение содержания белка от референсных значенийв среднем 53 мг/дл при верхней границе нормы 45 мг/дл, тогда как такое отклонение у больных с подтвержденным ХВДП было значительнымв среднем 105 мг/дл [16]. Помимо прочего, следует учитывать вероятность повышения данных значений до 0,6 г/л у здоровых людей старше 60 лет [17].…”
Section: классификация и краткое описание форм хронической воспалителunclassified