Adult brightness vs. luminance as models of infant photometry: Variability, biasability, and spectral characteristics for the two age groups favor the luminance model

Abstract

When infants fail to make chromatic discriminations, do the characteristics of their performance minima coincide more closely with the properties of adult luminance matches or heterochromatic brightness matches? In addition to their spectral properties, adult luminance matches are typically characterized by relatively small individual differences, whereas brightness matches are believed to be both more variable and more biasable. Two complementary experiments were carried out on adults and 8-week-old infant subjects. Both groups were tested with small (1.5 degrees to 4 degrees ) red and blue test fields of varying luminances, embedded in a white surround. In adults, heterochromatic brightness matches were measured. Individual differences spanned about 0.5 log units, and brightness matches could be biased by as much as 0.8 log units by varying the range of test field luminances. In infants, the locations of performance minima were measured. Individual differences spanned less than 0.1 log units, the mean performance minima coincided with predictions based on V10(lambda), and the location of the performance minimum was nearly unaffected by the range of test field luminances used. Thus by all three criteria, these data suggest that infants' performance minima are mediated by luminance rather than by brightness signals. To date there remains no evidence that the infant visual system computes a brightness signal.

Infants' spontaneous color preferences are not due to adult-like brightness variations

“…Such an outcome would have been welcome because it would have provided the first evidence that the infant visual system computes a brightness signal (cf. Teller et al, 2003). This result would also be consistent with the separability of brightness from hue and saturation, and would begin the task of confirming the working model as a description of infant color perception.…”

Using obstacle detection to identify appropriate illuminances for lighting in residential roads

“…In both cases, the average horizontal illuminances ranged from about 1.0 lx to 12.0 lx. A nine-point rating scale was used, with points labelled very poor (1), poor (3), adequate (5), good (7) and very good (9) and the items rated included an overall impression and levels of lighting on the road and footpath. The results suggest that higher illuminances lead to higher ratings of overall impression.…”

“…The results suggest that higher illuminances lead to higher ratings of overall impression. Horizontal illuminances of 10.0 lx, 5.0 lx and 2.5 lx were subsequently proposed, as these corresponded to ratings of good (7), adequate (5) and poor-to-adequate (4) respectively.…”

Pediatric Perimeter—A Novel Device to Measure Visual Fields in Infants and Patients with Special Needs

“…15 It is known that infants' scotopic and photopic spectral sensitivity curves are similar to adults. 16–19 The luminance of the LEDs was set to 30 cd/m 2 . This value was determined by subjectively measuring the luminance of the LED that did not cause scatter when projected on the blind spot of two adult subjects (PNS, SD).…”