2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adult-adult social play in captive chimpanzees: Is it indicative of positive animal welfare?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We predicted that the rate of mutual grooming could have a negative relationship with HC levels and that the rate of social play would not show any relationship with HC levels. This is because our previous study (Yamanashi et al 2017) showed that the rate of mutual grooming implied an affiliative relationship with others, but social play did not imply such a relationship in the same population of chimpanzees. Finally, we hypothesized that a balance between giving and receiving grooming is also important (grooming balance hypothesis).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We predicted that the rate of mutual grooming could have a negative relationship with HC levels and that the rate of social play would not show any relationship with HC levels. This is because our previous study (Yamanashi et al 2017) showed that the rate of mutual grooming implied an affiliative relationship with others, but social play did not imply such a relationship in the same population of chimpanzees. Finally, we hypothesized that a balance between giving and receiving grooming is also important (grooming balance hypothesis).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The frequency of playful behavior typically declines as juveniles transition into adulthood, although adults may maintain playful relationships with juveniles (e.g., geladas, Theropithecus gelada : Mancini & Palagi, 2009 ; chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes : Palagi et al, 2004 ; Shimada & Sueur, 2014 ). Less frequently, adult-adult play can occur in some primate species in both sexual and non-sexual contexts ( Pellis & Iwaniuk, 1999 ; T. gelada : Mancini & Palagi, 2009 ; bonobos, P. paniscus : Palagi, 2006 ; ring-tailed lemurs, Lemur catta : Palagi, 2009 ; Pellis & Iwaniuk, 2000 ; P. troglodytes : Yamanashi et al, 2018 ) but may exhibit variable forms and functions in species with different social organization. In primates, e.g., Macaca spp., social organization exerts a pervasive influence on a variety of behaviors, including play ( Ciani et al, 2012 ; Fagen, 1981 ; Maestripieri, 2004 ; Thierry, 2007 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in captive settings, both Pan species benefit from a high predictability of future interactions (e.g., often all group members meet every day) and cannot engage in border patrols or group hunting. Nevertheless, both captive species show high proportions of mutual grooming [the present study: 9% in bonobos and 15% in chimpanzees; De Waal and Seres, 1997; Fedurek and Dunbar, 2009;Yamanashi et al, 2018]. This suggests that mutual grooming does not serve as time sav-Folia Primatol 2020;91:481-494 492 Allanic/Hayashi/Matsuzawa DOI: 10.1159/000506308 ings or to help individuals maintain strong cooperative bonds but other functions such as maximizing short-term benefits, as found in the present study and in Machanda et al [2014].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%