2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0006-87052012005000029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adubação com fósforo em cana-soca e sua interação com magnésio

Abstract: Existem dúvidas a respeito da eficiência da adubação fosfatada na cana-soca, bem como, em relação às interações do fósforo (P) com outros nutrientes que poderiam afetar as respostas da cultura à reaplicação de P. Realizou-se um estudo para avaliar os possíveis efeitos da aplicação de P (45 e 90 kg ha-1 de P2O5) na ausência ou na presença de adubação com Mg (50 kg ha-1 de Mg) sobre a produção de colmos da cana-soca. A adubação fosfatada promoveu acréscimos de 17% na produção de colmos em relação ao tratamento c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…IACSP94–2094 and IACSP95–5000 exhibited higher P efficiency (better performance under low P supply) than IAC91–1099 and IACSP94–2101. Thus, taken together, these results reveal interdependence between P efficiency of sugarcane varieties and the regrowth vigour under low P availability, which corresponds to a finding of practical relevance, as ratoon productivity is commonly impaired by P deficiency in tropical soils (Landell et al , 2003; Zambrosi, 2012). Taking into account that the difference in shoot P uptake between IACSP94–2094 and IACSP95–5000 vs .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…IACSP94–2094 and IACSP95–5000 exhibited higher P efficiency (better performance under low P supply) than IAC91–1099 and IACSP94–2101. Thus, taken together, these results reveal interdependence between P efficiency of sugarcane varieties and the regrowth vigour under low P availability, which corresponds to a finding of practical relevance, as ratoon productivity is commonly impaired by P deficiency in tropical soils (Landell et al , 2003; Zambrosi, 2012). Taking into account that the difference in shoot P uptake between IACSP94–2094 and IACSP95–5000 vs .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…IACSP94-2094 and IACSP95-5000 exhibited higher P efficiency (better performance under low P supply) than IAC91-1099 and IACSP94-2101. Thus, taken together, these results reveal interdependence between P efficiency of sugarcane varieties and the regrowth vigour under low P availability, which corresponds to a finding of practical relevance, as ratoon productivity is commonly impaired by P deficiency in tropical soils (Landell et al, 2003;Zambrosi, 2012). Taking into account that the difference in shoot P uptake between IACSP94-2094 and IACSP95-5000 vs. IAC91-1099 and IACSP94-2101 was of a much higher magnitude than that observed for shoot P utilization efficiency (Figures 3a and 4), we might argue that P acquisition efficiency was the component of P efficiency that drove the improved shoot biomass of IACSP94-2094 and IACSP95-5000 in a P deficient soil during the regrowth period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In many areas of production, overuse of fertilizer P to correct perceived poor soil P availability continues regardless of soil P fertility level. In other areas, P fertilizer is only applied when cane yields start to decline (Landell et al, ; Zambrosi, ). Considerable yield gaps, therefore, exist across Brazil: for example, in Northeast Brazil, yields remain much lower (c. 60 Mg/ha) than the national average due to the lack of regular rainfall, lower levels of mechanization, poor soils, and poorer management (CONAB, ).…”
Section: R Options For the Sustainable Management Of P In Sugarcanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interação não significativa (p < 0,05): média das doses de P para o efeito calagem e média dos tratamentos com e sem calagem para o efeito doses de P. ns e * não significativo e significativo para o teste F (efeito calagem) e para a análise de regressão (efeito doses de P), a 5% de probabilidade de erro (p < 0,05). DOI: doi.org/10.18671/scifor.v47n123.05 (NAKAGAWA;ROSOLEM, 2005) e não alteração (BOYHAN et al, 2007), não sendo possível estabelecer um padrão definido sobre o efeito da adubação fosfatada no estado nutricional de K nas plantas (ZAMBROSI, 2011).…”
Section: Parâmetros Avaliadosunclassified