2005
DOI: 10.3184/095422905782774928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption properties of soil humic and fulvic acids by hematite

Abstract: The adsorption isotherms and their size fractionations of soil humic and fulvic acids (HA and FA, respectively) were determined at pH 7, 9.2 and 11, where the surfaces of the hematite are positively, neutrally and negatively charged, respectively. The M w , M n and polydispersity in the solution after adsorption were measured in order to investigate the preferential adsorption trend of the HA and FA. The measured adsorption was consistent with the adsorption from Langmuir isotherm fitting. The adsorption of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect, however, does not necessarily account for all the iron (oxy)hydroxides that were observed in the extracts since iron (oxy)hydroxides could also be mobilized from the native soil. Humic acids adsorb to Fe mineral surfaces to a greater extent than fulvic acids (Ko et al, 2005;Weng et al, 2006), and humic acids were only present in soil extracts with pH ≥ 7. Co-mobilization of iron (oxy)hydroxide nanoparticles from the native soil, together with their humic acid coatings, could therefore occur in the extracts with pH ≥ 7.…”
Section: Formation Versus Co-extraction Of Fe Mineral Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This effect, however, does not necessarily account for all the iron (oxy)hydroxides that were observed in the extracts since iron (oxy)hydroxides could also be mobilized from the native soil. Humic acids adsorb to Fe mineral surfaces to a greater extent than fulvic acids (Ko et al, 2005;Weng et al, 2006), and humic acids were only present in soil extracts with pH ≥ 7. Co-mobilization of iron (oxy)hydroxide nanoparticles from the native soil, together with their humic acid coatings, could therefore occur in the extracts with pH ≥ 7.…”
Section: Formation Versus Co-extraction Of Fe Mineral Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Soil HA was extracted from non-contaminated forest soils (Jangsung, Jeolanamdo, Korea) following the standard procedure recommended by the International Humic Substances Society [21,22]. Electrolyte-free HA was prepared using a cation-anion-exchange resin column and stored at 4 • C in the dark.…”
Section: Isolation Of Soil Hamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results regarding vivianite suggest a reduction in the solubility likely due to the adsorption of organic matter on Fe‐rich particles (vivianite or oxides formed from it). The adsorption of components of DBV, such as fulvic acids,4 on Fe oxides is well documented 42. This adsorption may decrease Fe extractability and availability to plants,43, 44 because ligand‐controlled Fe dissolution requires the adsorption of the ligand on the surface of the Fe‐rich particle,45 and this adsorption can be decreased if organic compounds present in DBV are previously adsorbed on the sorption sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%