2007
DOI: 10.1134/s0036024407050238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption properties of lamellar silica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the heats of adsorption at infinite dilution at 298 K for all three water models were close to each other: 33.2, 31.0, and 29.7 kJ/mol for the SPC, MSPC/E, and SPC/exp-6 models, respectively, which are all in good agreement with various experimental work ,,,, and with the value of 32.5 kJ/mol calculated by Demontis et al However, when the vapor-phase adsorption isotherms at 298 K were calculated for the three water models, it was seen that water−water−silicalite three-body interactions had a significant impact on the accuracy of the simulations. Isotherms for the three different models are shown in Figure , in comparison with the previous experimental data , that exhibit significant variations due to the differences in samples used, where the effects of various defects, their distribution, and their crystal size are significant. The steep water uptake in experimental isotherms may be attributed to capillary condensation occurring in the mesoporosity or macroporosity of the zeolite sample .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the heats of adsorption at infinite dilution at 298 K for all three water models were close to each other: 33.2, 31.0, and 29.7 kJ/mol for the SPC, MSPC/E, and SPC/exp-6 models, respectively, which are all in good agreement with various experimental work ,,,, and with the value of 32.5 kJ/mol calculated by Demontis et al However, when the vapor-phase adsorption isotherms at 298 K were calculated for the three water models, it was seen that water−water−silicalite three-body interactions had a significant impact on the accuracy of the simulations. Isotherms for the three different models are shown in Figure , in comparison with the previous experimental data , that exhibit significant variations due to the differences in samples used, where the effects of various defects, their distribution, and their crystal size are significant. The steep water uptake in experimental isotherms may be attributed to capillary condensation occurring in the mesoporosity or macroporosity of the zeolite sample .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Silicalite-1, which is an all-silica version of MFI-type zeolite ZSM-5, is especially suitable for some possible environmental applications of the removal and/or remediation of organics, such as chlorinated VOCs , and MTBE , in water. Consequently, the behavior of water confined within silicalite-1 has become a subject of great scientific and technological interest. , However, there is not much agreement among these studies, which may be attributed to the differences in samples used in these experiments, where the effects of various defects, their distribution, and crystal size are significant. A typical example is the work of Oumi et al, where the authors obtained two different isotherms depending on whether the crystals were prepared in the presence of HF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its solution is largely due to the choice of grid parameters. The procedure of the grid parameters choosing is the same as for thermal diffusivity phase [13] and chemical conversions [14].…”
Section: Mathematical Model and Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the procedures [13,14] are used for values of the heat flux less then 10 5 W/ m2 and large heating time.…”
Section: Mathematical Model and Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation