2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.04.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of water vapour from humid air by selected carbon adsorbents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tedlar [27,28,34]) and some analytical problems during the gas chromatographic analysis of VSCs in humidified samples. The most commonly reported humidity effects are: decrease of the adsorption capacity of the sorbents, plugging of cold traps at sub-zero temperatures and retention time variations in the case of the sorbent trapping [21,38,39], and decrease of the extraction efficiency in the SPME [35]. The last effect was also observed during our studies and was particularly severe for H 2 S, COS, MeSH and EtSH (80% efficiency drop) [41].…”
Section: Stability Testssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Tedlar [27,28,34]) and some analytical problems during the gas chromatographic analysis of VSCs in humidified samples. The most commonly reported humidity effects are: decrease of the adsorption capacity of the sorbents, plugging of cold traps at sub-zero temperatures and retention time variations in the case of the sorbent trapping [21,38,39], and decrease of the extraction efficiency in the SPME [35]. The last effect was also observed during our studies and was particularly severe for H 2 S, COS, MeSH and EtSH (80% efficiency drop) [41].…”
Section: Stability Testssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Humidity of breath samples strongly affects the GC analyses of VSCs. The most undesirable effects are: decrease of the sorbents adsorption capacity, plugging of cold traps, retention time variations and decrease of the extraction efficiency in SPME [15,23,34,35]. Several methods of water removal have been proposed to avoid these effects.…”
Section: Breath Samplingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Dry air corresponding analytical parameters are listed in Table 1. For wet air experiments (15 500 ppmv H 2 O), a multi-bed cartridge composed of three hydrophobic sorbents (Carbopack X, Carbopack B, Carbopack C) was used in order to prevent water trapping [19,20]. Likewise, the sampling temperature was set to 15 • C for these experiments.…”
Section: Analytical Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%