2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of volatile aroma compound 2-phenylethanol from synthetic solution onto granular activated carbon in batch and continuous modes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an area where further developments are likely. For example, adsorption of 2‐PE onto polymeric resins has been investigated with good results with S. cerevisiae (Carpiné et al, ; Hua et al, ; Mei et al, ). The results can probably be transferred easily to K. marxianus , provided there is biocompatibility of the adsorber material.…”
Section: Higher Alcoholsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an area where further developments are likely. For example, adsorption of 2‐PE onto polymeric resins has been investigated with good results with S. cerevisiae (Carpiné et al, ; Hua et al, ; Mei et al, ). The results can probably be transferred easily to K. marxianus , provided there is biocompatibility of the adsorber material.…”
Section: Higher Alcoholsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that processes used to recover coffee aromas in industries (Herrera et al, 1970;Nestec and Liu, 1986), boil down to wetting roast and ground coffee, but present the drawbacks of high-energy spending and the possibility of degradation of the compounds involved. Other alternatives for the recovery of coffee aroma have been investigated as adsorption (Canteli et al, 2014;Carpiné et al, 2013;Sacano et al, 1996Sacano et al, , 1999Zuim et al, 2011), supercritical extraction (Lucas and Cocero, 2006;Lucas et al, 2004), wet grinding (Baggenstoss et al, 2010), nanofiltration (Vincze and Vatai, 2004;Pan et al, 2013) and other membrane processes (Brazinha et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 12/28 alternative is true (r<1 in (7)). 54,55,57,60,64,65,68,70,73,75,78 Fixed-bed processes are often chosen for their continuous flow adsorption design and their ability to completely remove contaminants from an effluent up to a certain time set by a threshold effluent concentration. However, mixed results reported in Tables 1 and 2 demonstrate that the efficiency of an adsorption process in term of uptake capacity per unit mass of adsorbent is not always higher in a continuous flow operation than in a batch process.…”
Section: Comparison Between Batch and Fixed Bed Adsorption Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54,55,57,60,64,65,68,70,73,75,78 The equations (7) may be used to explain these mixed results, and can serve as figures of merit to qualitatively and quantitatively determine the best adsorption method (i.e. fixed bed or batch) to reduce the bulk concentration of a known contaminated effluent to a targeted value.…”
Section: Assessment Of Literature Data Based On the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%