Adsorption of Sulphur Dioxide Using Natural and Modified Gördes Clinoptilolites

Abstract

ABSTRACT:The adsorption of SO 2 onto clinoptilolite-rich zeolite tuff from Gördes (Turkey) (natural-G) and its cation-exchanged (Na ) forms was investigated up to 100 kPa pressure at two different temperatures (273 K and 293 K). The structural properties of the clinoptilolites were studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. Quantitative XRD analysis showed that the major component of the natural-G sample was clinoptilolite, together with minor amounts of feldspar, opal-CT, smectite, mica-illite and amorphous material (opal-A).

Functionalized NU-1000 with an Iridium Organometallic Fragment: SO2 Capture Enhancement

“…In addition, these methods suffer from a substantial cost of use and recovery . Therefore, the progress of new and emerging adsorbent materials for the capture of SO 2 , in high amounts, via physisorption processes is rapidly growing. − For example, zeolites have been proposed for this task, since they have basic oxygen atoms on the surface affording good candidates for SO 2 capture. , However, the regeneration process involves heating up to 450 °C, or even higher temperatures, or employing chemical treatments such as H 2 O 2 , leading to a structural transformation and a loss in porosity.…”

Influence of activated carbon surface oxygen functionalities on SO2 physisorption – Simulation and experiment

“…Different methods are used to reduce the emission of this gas [1]. The adsorption process, as one of these methods, has been studied very frequently due to its simplicity and low cost [4].…”

Detection of SO2 using a chemically stable Ni(ii)-MOF

“…7 However, this technology has demonstrated serious disadvantages such as low capture of SO 2 , vast quantities of wastewater, corrosion of pipelines, and considerable cost of use and recovery. 8 In addition, other solid-state materials (e.g., zeolites 9 and metal oxides 10 ) have been investigated for the efficient capture of SO 2 with considerable drawbacks, such as high re-activation temperatures (above 250 °C) and a significant loss in porosity. 11 Unquestionably, the capture of SO 2 has shown to be a challenging task that requires new technological approaches.…”