1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0728(98)00424-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of sulfate ions on monocrystalline copper electrodes: the structural effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[30,31] For the Cu(111) surface radiotracer experiments yielded a maximum sulphate coverage of the order of 0.2 ML, referenced to the topmost Cu layer. [13] The absolute surface excess of sulphate corresponded well with that in the Cu (1 1) UPD structure on Au(111) and was slightly lower than the sulphate surface excess in the Cu ( ffiffi ffi 3 p  ffiffi ffi 3 p ) UPD on Au(111). [9] Hence, from these data on well-ordered surfaces, additional sulphate adsorption upon the first stages of bulk Cu deposition on Cu UPD is not expected to occur on well-ordered Au(111).…”
Section: à2mentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[30,31] For the Cu(111) surface radiotracer experiments yielded a maximum sulphate coverage of the order of 0.2 ML, referenced to the topmost Cu layer. [13] The absolute surface excess of sulphate corresponded well with that in the Cu (1 1) UPD structure on Au(111) and was slightly lower than the sulphate surface excess in the Cu ( ffiffi ffi 3 p  ffiffi ffi 3 p ) UPD on Au(111). [9] Hence, from these data on well-ordered surfaces, additional sulphate adsorption upon the first stages of bulk Cu deposition on Cu UPD is not expected to occur on well-ordered Au(111).…”
Section: à2mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…[10,11] Radio-tracer studies proved the presence of sulphate on Cu UPD and Cu surfaces. [12][13][14] For more detailed information on Cu underpotential deposition see, for example, refs. [9,15] and a recent review.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is conceivable that the sulfate coverage on the Cu (1 × 1) UPD layer is lower than on the (√3 × √3) UPD I structure, since the adsorption state of sulfate on the (1 × 1) Cu layer strongly differs from that in the (√3 × √3) structure, where sulfate was found to be adsorbed in the hollow sites of a Cu honeycomb structure. 2 For Cu(111) a maximum sulfate coverage of about 0.2 ML was deduced from STM and radiotracer measurements, 64,65 which is considerably less than the sulfate coverage in the (√3 × √3) Cu UPD layer on Au(111). Hence, upon the completion of the (1 × 1) Cu layer a diminishment of the sulfate coverage is anticipated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been reported that only sulfate anions adsorb to the Cu surface , whereas alkali metal cations do not have substantial influences in the solution containing sulfate anions . Though sulfate anions could adsorb to Cu surface, the gas evolution reaction could only be affected in the presence of Cu (100) surface . In this research, a polycrystalline Cu catalyst was used to the electrochemical reduction of N 2 O and the onset potential of N 2 O reduction in both K 2 SO 4 (−0.8 V) and Na 2 SO 4 (−0.7 V) did not change in the concentration region we have investigated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In this research, Na + , K + cations and SO 4 2− anion could bring about these adsorption effects. However, it has been reported that only sulfate anions adsorb to the Cu surface , whereas alkali metal cations do not have substantial influences in the solution containing sulfate anions . Though sulfate anions could adsorb to Cu surface, the gas evolution reaction could only be affected in the presence of Cu (100) surface .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%