2022
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/ac973b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of rhodamine 6G and choline on gold electrodes: a molecular dynamics study

Abstract: The adsorption of analyte molecules on nano-optoelectrodes (e.g., a combined nanoantenna and nanoelectrode device) significantly affects the signal characteristics in Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) measurements. Understanding how different molecules adsorb on electrodes and their modulation of electrical potential help better interpret SERS measurements. This work investigates the adsorption of prototypical analyte molecules, Rhodamine 6G and choline, on gold electrodes with negative, neutral, and po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the Au•••H-X bonding reported in the previous work [22], the adsorption could also occur by building noncovalent Au-N interactions featuring an ultrafast charge transfer [46], in which the dative Au←:N bond can be electrochemically converted to an electronically transparent Au-N bond [47]. As supported in another study, the Au-N or Au-O anchor bonds can also be reinforced by N-H•••Au bonds [48], thus with the NaCl-rich nature of the electrolyte [49] and rough surface of the Au NRA [50], R-6G could be easily adsorbed during the electrochemical removal process. The difference in the detection results might origin from the mechanisms of the respective techniques; SERS detects the analytes through their adsorption on and interactions with the substrates [51], while UV-Vis detection follows the Beer-Lambert law through optical absorption and subsequent calculated concentrations of the analytes [52].…”
Section: R-6g Removal and Sensingmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Apart from the Au•••H-X bonding reported in the previous work [22], the adsorption could also occur by building noncovalent Au-N interactions featuring an ultrafast charge transfer [46], in which the dative Au←:N bond can be electrochemically converted to an electronically transparent Au-N bond [47]. As supported in another study, the Au-N or Au-O anchor bonds can also be reinforced by N-H•••Au bonds [48], thus with the NaCl-rich nature of the electrolyte [49] and rough surface of the Au NRA [50], R-6G could be easily adsorbed during the electrochemical removal process. The difference in the detection results might origin from the mechanisms of the respective techniques; SERS detects the analytes through their adsorption on and interactions with the substrates [51], while UV-Vis detection follows the Beer-Lambert law through optical absorption and subsequent calculated concentrations of the analytes [52].…”
Section: R-6g Removal and Sensingmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The charges in CHARMM− GUI-generated topology files for R6G were manually corrected to match restrained electrostatic potential partial (RESP) atomic charges obtained from the highly accurate DFT B3LYP/6-31G** calculations reported by Chuichay et al 25 Finally, the generated force field (FF) parameters, including the chemical properties of R6G atoms, were compared with corresponding values obtained by Vaiana et al using automated frequency matching 32 for cross-validation. Furthermore, the R6G structure was previously used in other MD studies involving adsorption on gold electrodes 33 and TiO 2 hydroxylated surfaces. 34 SNPs were built using the Nanomaterial Modeler extension in CHARMM−GUI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, a PFOA molecule is initially adsorbed on the surface. Then, its center of mass (COM) is pulled through a spring (spring constant: 5000 kJ mol –1 nm –2 ) in the z -direction at a speed of 0.2 nm/ns toward the bulk solution until it reaches z = 1.86 nm . The pulling speed is selected as a balance between reducing the time needed to reach the desired sampling positions and maintaining the stability of the simulation.…”
Section: Simulation System and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, its center of mass (COM) is pulled through a spring (spring constant: 5000 kJ mol −1 nm −2 ) in the zdirection at a speed of 0.2 nm/ns toward the bulk solution until it reaches z = 1.86 nm. 42 The pulling speed is selected as a balance between reducing the time needed to reach the desired sampling positions and maintaining the stability of the simulation. A total of 20 initial configurations of the system are generated with window sizes of 0.05 nm near the surface and 0.1 nm near the bulk solution.…”
Section: Simulations Conducted and Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%